techfeudalist on Nostr: The explanation here on why OP_CAT was disabled is misleading. It wasn’t ...
The explanation here on why OP_CAT was disabled is misleading. It wasn’t “developers” it was Satoshi. And nobody knows why Satoshi disabled it, because he never said.
Advocates of OP_CAT want us to believe that it’s safe. Notice that they never address the real risk - that the feature causes miners to become more centralized from MEV.
Maybe Satoshi noticed the risk to miners. Nobody knows. Regardless, OP_CAT is dangerous and unnecessary.
Published at
2024-09-06 13:56:57Event JSON
{
"id": "758020fb4bfb669672e81c303d81c71eff781c7ba167e723089a69e1b68b7260",
"pubkey": "98a386c766ac9250f4ce1b500662fd08e4d464a1915743eedc83bd50521decac",
"created_at": 1725631017,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"d96e82c68345ca5ea26393130098e957b78ffcd7a339dd9d9847d6252d311a89",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"f728d9e6e7048358e70930f5ca64b097770d989ccd86854fe618eda9c8a38106"
]
],
"content": "The explanation here on why OP_CAT was disabled is misleading. It wasn’t “developers” it was Satoshi. And nobody knows why Satoshi disabled it, because he never said. \n\nAdvocates of OP_CAT want us to believe that it’s safe. Notice that they never address the real risk - that the feature causes miners to become more centralized from MEV. \n\nMaybe Satoshi noticed the risk to miners. Nobody knows. Regardless, OP_CAT is dangerous and unnecessary.",
"sig": "feb065185f0cf347f0324caf96393fd15005370b6bc270827c05c9404a6afae13e52f8f65df356e90c697001d3ce61117550e9a47657f85a7f26eb6cf007ea6c"
}