In all seriousness, what I meant was, how could you verify that the data associated with an entity's actions is spontaneously obtained and not spoofed.
Simple examples:
- you performing a push-up
- recording GPS coordinates / heart-rate through all the stages of a long distance event
How could you verify either of those? You could approximate the heart-rate to other riders/runners, copy coordinates or movements (from a body tracking suit) from somebody else.
Even if 3rd party was present to vouch for an action taken, how do you verify they are truthful and not a sock puppet building a whole community of fakes?
That's the part where I said device instead of 3rd party. Once this is figured out, the metric could be "field" specific. Whichever entity does the most verifiable actions in a specific "field", the higher the count and on the ladder they are.
It'd be based on provable real life work in a specific field of study or whatever grouping it would have. But it wouldn't be general like followers, but a lot more proof-of-performed-actions specific.
"Influencers" would actually have to perform the actions, as opposed to what's happening now, where the primary action is pocketing money.
_itself /
npub1ga…dnrdt
2024-05-21 14:03:08
in reply to nevent1q…7ttg
Author Public Key
npub1gauhnumwgsljkggud6v0u3pu5mwuaqvd7r8wtsm3q97tnmjlr3rqpdnrdtPublished at
2024-05-21 14:03:08Event JSON
{
"id": "7018bb6ccee4ff8605b6176d87df2e27dea080fb39a05dc32340dc08cab0c343",
"pubkey": "477979f36e443f2b211c6e98fe443ca6ddce818df0cee5c371017cb9ee5f1c46",
"created_at": 1716300188,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"05bb6c4a785ea5af62e4450bab65b59d67c59025cead1a435f245d184315770c",
"wss://relay.primal.net",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"d7172385a64cfd6138c614b7bf2b0fcc2e5ec50a4c46cdb5d1eec0c2b35f7b98",
"wss://relay.primal.net",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"477979f36e443f2b211c6e98fe443ca6ddce818df0cee5c371017cb9ee5f1c46"
],
[
"p",
"3bf0c63fcb93463407af97a5e5ee64fa883d107ef9e558472c4eb9aaaefa459d"
]
],
"content": "In all seriousness, what I meant was, how could you verify that the data associated with an entity's actions is spontaneously obtained and not spoofed.\n\nSimple examples:\n- you performing a push-up\n- recording GPS coordinates / heart-rate through all the stages of a long distance event\n\nHow could you verify either of those? You could approximate the heart-rate to other riders/runners, copy coordinates or movements (from a body tracking suit) from somebody else.\n\nEven if 3rd party was present to vouch for an action taken, how do you verify they are truthful and not a sock puppet building a whole community of fakes?\n\nThat's the part where I said device instead of 3rd party. Once this is figured out, the metric could be \"field\" specific. Whichever entity does the most verifiable actions in a specific \"field\", the higher the count and on the ladder they are.\n\nIt'd be based on provable real life work in a specific field of study or whatever grouping it would have. But it wouldn't be general like followers, but a lot more proof-of-performed-actions specific.\n\n\"Influencers\" would actually have to perform the actions, as opposed to what's happening now, where the primary action is pocketing money.",
"sig": "a5c12dd0c012eaf0a685cfa827a1b613a65a3e5b7680f414d2a387a7800d52f89ce91a9448e2a20485b3974753cf150f0f4d6fdc8717b9da18846f96e9ee8e32"
}