Why Nostr? What is Njump?
2023-06-07 18:09:16
in reply to

Pavol Rusnak [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: šŸ“… Original date posted:2018-01-07 šŸ“ Original message:On 05/01/18 14:58, nullius ...

šŸ“… Original date posted:2018-01-07
šŸ“ Original message:On 05/01/18 14:58, nullius via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> I propose and request as an enhancement that the BIP 39 wordlist set
> should specify canonical native language strings to identify each
> wordlist, as well as short ASCII language codes.Ā  At present, the
> languages are identified only by their names in English.

I am advising not to use any other language than English for BIP39. I
got persuaded to allow more languages when writing BIP39 spec, but I
learned that it was something I should've been more persistently against.

I am currently drafting a new standard[1] which will allow also Shamir
Secret Scheme Splitting and there we disallow usage of a custom wordlist
in order to eradicate this mess. Will try to push this as BIP too once
we get it to the point we are OK with the contents.

https://github.com/satoshilabs/slips/blob/master/slip-0039.md

--
Best Regards / S pozdravom,

Pavol "stick" Rusnak
CTO, SatoshiLabs

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20180107/8eef9b25/attachment.sig>;
Author Public Key
npub1wccnjljxnarlx564vuc37hmuzuffurljevjnmuq4u0vjmh7e933sn3hnuq