From what I can tell - Drivechain might make miners more money and we don't know what they'll do with it.... Drivechains enable other things to be built on Bitcoin, that could be bad.... Drivechains are too complex because I am not a developer therefore they are scary and bad.
But it honestly is starting to seem more like subconscious protection of the LN related investments or some weird fears of the unknown with regards to the SEC claiming any namable entity who builds anything new on the protocol automatically renders it a security idk...
I don't see the drivechain critics talk bad about CTV or recursive covenants (in regards to complexity and potential for unforseen consequences...)
HuluvuBlue /
npub1an…4mc0h
2023-08-09 21:22:05
in reply to nevent1q…wvmh
Author Public Key
npub1anecye9mwjc82v9x9cnzunwyjl80wpr0up87x5ms58ah8ycdxdqqq4mc0hPublished at
2023-08-09 21:22:05Event JSON
{
"id": "70a6e91ebae65b1aa14b67c8fe37adf49cd1084b3988e1ae5ce4066552f031b7",
"pubkey": "ecf38264bb74b07530a62e262e4dc497cef7046fe04fe35370a1fb73930d3340",
"created_at": 1691616125,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"51219f5b3a5e9d8378b750c5b7081256f6020b31cb1a87d95debcd6b1bc592fb",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"6499f06849781947357df088ba4d0c053b46c349b59189e79c7a35c85a5eacd0",
"wss://nostr-pub.wellorder.net/",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"98a386c766ac9250f4ce1b500662fd08e4d464a1915743eedc83bd50521decac"
],
[
"p",
"85080d3bad70ccdcd7f74c29a44f55bb85cbcd3dd0cbb957da1d215bdb931204"
],
[
"p",
"eab0e756d32b80bcd464f3d844b8040303075a13eabc3599a762c9ac7ab91f4f"
]
],
"content": "From what I can tell - Drivechain might make miners more money and we don't know what they'll do with it.... Drivechains enable other things to be built on Bitcoin, that could be bad.... Drivechains are too complex because I am not a developer therefore they are scary and bad. \n\nBut it honestly is starting to seem more like subconscious protection of the LN related investments or some weird fears of the unknown with regards to the SEC claiming any namable entity who builds anything new on the protocol automatically renders it a security idk...\n\nI don't see the drivechain critics talk bad about CTV or recursive covenants (in regards to complexity and potential for unforseen consequences...)\n\n",
"sig": "7eea1052d3aa6088b427bf59c1e9f21b140f4b327d60a85972b0c528353bb6907acdc78605d7c719a4a0ead404ee4e577d553b1e83c3a42f6d86adea823c2d51"
}