📅 Original date posted:2014-03-31
📝 Original message:Does't BIP70 cover this already via Certificate Authorities?
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:21 PM, vv01f <vv01f at riseup.net> wrote:
> Some users on bitcointalk[0] would like to have their vanity addresses
> available for others easily to find and verify the ownership over a kind
> of WoT. Right now they sign their own addresses and quote them in the
> forums.
> As I pointed out there already the centralized storage in the forums is
> not secury anyhow and signed messages could be swapped easily with the
> next hack of the forums.
>
> Is that use case taken care of in any plans already?
>
> I thought about abusing pgp keyservers but that would suit for single
> vanity addresses only.
> It seems webfinger could be part of a solution where servers of a
> business can tell and proof you if a specific address is owned by them.
>
> [0] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=502538
> [1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=505095
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
Natanael [ARCHIVE] /
npub179…lpmjt
2023-06-07 15:16:47
in reply to nevent1q…3nuy
Author Public Key
npub1798ncudyucap9jzzujjsgufx8tdykm8auzfledjcs6f6wf4ekqvq8lpmjtPublished at
2023-06-07 15:16:47Event JSON
{
"id": "79a7a79f11f370e6b7ad16eb7da6b60122814e72c8fcaca5a6d255db3ce2473d",
"pubkey": "f14f3c71a4e63a12c842e4a50471263ada4b6cfde093fcb6588693a726b9b018",
"created_at": 1686151007,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"3af4773a7d3999abaf86aa3389ec302dbe50833abc483e267452e56f13cf34e1",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"52c0bf211ef0af9d8513204ce8a4ce07f9b34de20081dfac33afa32e5cb22839",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"d38df61bb4c2a88c75d64e13e669c71f494861db3ace4782c60a471bd31493fa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-03-31\n📝 Original message:Does't BIP70 cover this already via Certificate Authorities?\n\nOn Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:21 PM, vv01f \u003cvv01f at riseup.net\u003e wrote:\n\u003e Some users on bitcointalk[0] would like to have their vanity addresses\n\u003e available for others easily to find and verify the ownership over a kind\n\u003e of WoT. Right now they sign their own addresses and quote them in the\n\u003e forums.\n\u003e As I pointed out there already the centralized storage in the forums is\n\u003e not secury anyhow and signed messages could be swapped easily with the\n\u003e next hack of the forums.\n\u003e\n\u003e Is that use case taken care of in any plans already?\n\u003e\n\u003e I thought about abusing pgp keyservers but that would suit for single\n\u003e vanity addresses only.\n\u003e It seems webfinger could be part of a solution where servers of a\n\u003e business can tell and proof you if a specific address is owned by them.\n\u003e\n\u003e [0] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=502538\n\u003e [1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=505095\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e ------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e Bitcoin-development mailing list\n\u003e Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net\n\u003e https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development\n\u003e",
"sig": "bf23ba0b8852da4d9d678afe3e620a7efa83cee9306c3f4d5a508e52c44e415733bca703f282f6466f82bc5b4a12bab27935dcec77b8dd2da53f089dac4613cb"
}