š
Original date posted:2015-06-27
š Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 27 June 2015 10:39:51 GMT-04:00, Michael Naber <mickeybob at gmail.com> wrote:
>Compromise: Can we agree that raising the block size to a static 8MB
>now
>with a plan to increase it further should demand necessitate except in
>the
>special case above is a reasonable path forward?
It's not a reasonable path forward right now given the lack of testing done with 8MB+ blocks, among many other problems. A way to help make that appear more reasonable would be to setup a 8MB testnet as I suggested, with two years or so of 8MB blocks in history as well as a large UTXO set to test performance characteristics.
Of course, that'll be a 840GB download - if that's unreasonable you might want to ask why 8MB blocks are reasonable...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQE9BAEBCAAnIBxQZXRlciBUb2RkIDxwZXRlQHBldGVydG9kZC5vcmc+BQJVjr9n
AAoJEMCF8hzn9Lnc47AIAIIwu4maaJs4pAKpK00jQnhPNIQ8LPvijD/8vvyugA1z
OLxlRrn8zs7JPFbxWOAzK2qzT1RksSd0gbXqWm/Saqk9CAG5LBp7Oq0HAVE23XYt
6BvyhjyhYaZjDrv+SZvlSjdl5xfpDNPMIXMi7XblKD9hm1GIUSVIYAOinOSVIy0B
HlKyn/xc4MaO8DuzQcs0vsNMudVQFLMOLjMWz/7iv41NnB/Ujjzv/6845Z1g7Opf
d5AfxhPHZixshqav/lF7ly7xQwSZZpoJCyFdtzCNG47EQmFYY9e22uy1KVzS7Zeo
qYPi3KRx5+vFtHHJMDYG5EIMTwI4l/4+lY/Sd0CFWss=
=0IOS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] /
npub1m2ā¦a2np2
2023-06-07 15:40:47
in reply to nevent1qā¦6mpq
Author Public Key
npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2Published at
2023-06-07 15:40:47Event JSON
{
"id": "79e6695d4db1a7f954725c5857f9974b7f51961b555d08d74fb60f204ef50110",
"pubkey": "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa",
"created_at": 1686152447,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"302bda6b5cc3b22bc31708bc8101794c3e35655f608a2a34ebc62e92bc3dada4",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"6d20ad7cebe5a3918386fa86df99b68feae6efdf8a078d1f9cf7f46aa10ec5e4",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"88d911f6791fafcd4c24f30c66360e6f43dcea819b8f2942b83bdcb0aa7b454c"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2015-06-27\nš Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\nHash: SHA256\n\n\n\nOn 27 June 2015 10:39:51 GMT-04:00, Michael Naber \u003cmickeybob at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003eCompromise: Can we agree that raising the block size to a static 8MB\n\u003enow\n\u003ewith a plan to increase it further should demand necessitate except in\n\u003ethe\n\u003especial case above is a reasonable path forward?\n\nIt's not a reasonable path forward right now given the lack of testing done with 8MB+ blocks, among many other problems. A way to help make that appear more reasonable would be to setup a 8MB testnet as I suggested, with two years or so of 8MB blocks in history as well as a large UTXO set to test performance characteristics.\n\nOf course, that'll be a 840GB download - if that's unreasonable you might want to ask why 8MB blocks are reasonable...\n-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\n\niQE9BAEBCAAnIBxQZXRlciBUb2RkIDxwZXRlQHBldGVydG9kZC5vcmc+BQJVjr9n\nAAoJEMCF8hzn9Lnc47AIAIIwu4maaJs4pAKpK00jQnhPNIQ8LPvijD/8vvyugA1z\nOLxlRrn8zs7JPFbxWOAzK2qzT1RksSd0gbXqWm/Saqk9CAG5LBp7Oq0HAVE23XYt\n6BvyhjyhYaZjDrv+SZvlSjdl5xfpDNPMIXMi7XblKD9hm1GIUSVIYAOinOSVIy0B\nHlKyn/xc4MaO8DuzQcs0vsNMudVQFLMOLjMWz/7iv41NnB/Ujjzv/6845Z1g7Opf\nd5AfxhPHZixshqav/lF7ly7xQwSZZpoJCyFdtzCNG47EQmFYY9e22uy1KVzS7Zeo\nqYPi3KRx5+vFtHHJMDYG5EIMTwI4l/4+lY/Sd0CFWss=\n=0IOS\n-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----",
"sig": "75583d2c78074a5e947f6cade5ab3c693693212144f815efefbb79a2426c6a55689d746b7fea9f4b574ef8aabbc3df19ab3bd0118a2c63d3f0eae359e62aa9b3"
}