Luke Dashjr [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-10-21 📝 Original message:On Wednesday, October 21, ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-10-21
📝 Original message:On Wednesday, October 21, 2015 8:44:53 AM Christian Decker wrote:
> Hm, that is true as long as the signer is the only signer of the
> transaction, otherwise he'd be invalidating the signatures of the other
> signers.
Or he can just have the other signers re-sign with the modified version.
Even if it only worked with a single signer, it's still a form of malleability
that your BIP does not presently solve, but would be desirable to solve...
Luke
Published at
2023-06-07 17:43:43Event JSON
{
"id": "79037e6438c1b1473f135a24275533b55c32bf67af6e43e4d6866691afc130e0",
"pubkey": "5a6d1f44482b67b5b0d30cc1e829b66a251f0dc99448377dbe3c5e0faf6c3803",
"created_at": 1686159823,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"e71cb83b97f22f5353a76bf12fac79eec2c215f6e13d11b1eb608f076bcfae47",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"59d8c09ad2fec2a636abe82ff2d2c51e6dc03cb90d380a945f5b8f9dc44fa283",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"72cd40332ec782dd0a7f63acb03e3b6fdafa6d91bd1b6125cd8b7117a1bb8057"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-10-21\n📝 Original message:On Wednesday, October 21, 2015 8:44:53 AM Christian Decker wrote:\n\u003e Hm, that is true as long as the signer is the only signer of the\n\u003e transaction, otherwise he'd be invalidating the signatures of the other\n\u003e signers.\n\nOr he can just have the other signers re-sign with the modified version.\nEven if it only worked with a single signer, it's still a form of malleability \nthat your BIP does not presently solve, but would be desirable to solve...\n\nLuke",
"sig": "bb9d7de7dbdf8b5a3631d22d514df72e47aa9a6c0e4d6be3b3867524f504044693c7ef7c43a5a7f6734b089d05bd4d308ad4f7d65ffbf34b8d558abf09e7bcf9"
}