But why not at least be open to it if you can recognize it's technical superiority?
Why do Bitcoin maximalists outright reject it?
What's wrong with saying "well, obviously I'm going to continue using BTC for now since it has a lot of support at the moment, but I'll also help advocate for this incredibly promising technology"?
And yes, Nano really is is "SO MUCH" better, Bitcoin maximalists just refuse to acknowledge it as such.
### Compared to Bitcoin
instant >> 30-60 minutes for confirmation
deterministic finality >> probabilistic finality
feeless with no barriers for even the poorest people >> $2 and eventually $70+ fees
zero supply inflation >> 2% annual inflation
uncapped throughput >> 3-7 tps
incentivized decentralization >> incentivized centralization
Nakamoto Coef of 10 with $125M market cap >> NC of 2 with $500B mc
no rent-seeking middle-men >> miners
negligible energy usage >> 120TWh annual energy usage
### Compared to Lightning
feeless with no barriers for even the poorest people >> "minimal" fees
on-chain decentralization and security >> centralized and custodial sidechain
simplicity >> extreme complexity prone to bugs, vulnerabilities, and failures
direct P2P payments >> liquidity channel management with invoices
Have you actually tried it? It's an incredibly delighting experience.
atxmj /
npub14l…303ze
2023-02-24 22:00:26
in reply to nevent1q…ulwp
Author Public Key
npub14lynvghtf4uup7m4u4hqc9z48aepfv9yv647hg2vkwyk33n4te4qd303zePublished at
2023-02-24 22:00:26Event JSON
{
"id": "7928bb399f3c88c4863ff026f688a4fd742a02451f75b6030d0e6aa577fccca5",
"pubkey": "afc93622eb4d79c0fb75e56e0c14553f7214b0a466abeba14cb38968c6755e6a",
"created_at": 1677276026,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"0d01e2c9fe74331f569f806b3ea1bc32759ef76a1e25ab07c042272d9a050534"
],
[
"e",
"b609935e17ca8969236b3e27cbd0379dbf6df5e2b34fcfbf4e3803ae7501dd96"
],
[
"p",
"c78388160281fc98f07a221ade1dd0472757afe54a7b0ae66c02c3693099afe8"
]
],
"content": "But why not at least be open to it if you can recognize it's technical superiority?\n\nWhy do Bitcoin maximalists outright reject it?\n\nWhat's wrong with saying \"well, obviously I'm going to continue using BTC for now since it has a lot of support at the moment, but I'll also help advocate for this incredibly promising technology\"?\n\nAnd yes, Nano really is is \"SO MUCH\" better, Bitcoin maximalists just refuse to acknowledge it as such.\n\n### Compared to Bitcoin\ninstant \u003e\u003e 30-60 minutes for confirmation\ndeterministic finality \u003e\u003e probabilistic finality\nfeeless with no barriers for even the poorest people \u003e\u003e $2 and eventually $70+ fees\nzero supply inflation \u003e\u003e 2% annual inflation\nuncapped throughput \u003e\u003e 3-7 tps\nincentivized decentralization \u003e\u003e incentivized centralization\nNakamoto Coef of 10 with $125M market cap \u003e\u003e NC of 2 with $500B mc\nno rent-seeking middle-men \u003e\u003e miners\nnegligible energy usage \u003e\u003e 120TWh annual energy usage\n\n### Compared to Lightning\nfeeless with no barriers for even the poorest people \u003e\u003e \"minimal\" fees\non-chain decentralization and security \u003e\u003e centralized and custodial sidechain\nsimplicity \u003e\u003e extreme complexity prone to bugs, vulnerabilities, and failures\ndirect P2P payments \u003e\u003e liquidity channel management with invoices\n\nHave you actually tried it? It's an incredibly delighting experience.",
"sig": "afeb1a0beb860cd2e4af29045bfb430fba1b6067a8fadc4901fea059b37e81bcd728ae9ac5e9f843e0e227b772949d1c3a3f5abcc9488d7620fb176772a46cf6"
}