📅 Original date posted:2016-05-06
📝 Original message:Thanks Greg for the testing!
Note that to those who are reviewing the doc, a few minor tweaks to
wording and clarification have been made to the git version, so please
review there.
On 05/03/16 05:02, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The following is a BIP-formatted design spec for compact block relay
>> designed to limit on wire bytes during block relay. You can find the
>> latest version of this document at
>> https://github.com/TheBlueMatt/bips/blob/master/bip-TODO.mediawiki.
>
> Thanks Matt!
>
> I've been testing this for a couple weeks (in various forms). I've
> been getting over 96% reduction in block-bytes sent. I don't have a
> good metric for it, but bandwidth spikes are greatly reduced. The
> largest blocktxn message I've seen on a node that has been up for at
> least a day is 475736 bytes. 94% of the blocks less than 100kb must be
> sent in total.
>
> In the opportunistic mode my measurements are showing 73% of blocks
> transferred with 0.5 RTT even without prediction, 87% if up to 4
> additional transactions are predicted, and 91% for 30 transactions (my
> rough estimate for the 10k maximum prediction suggested in the BIP.
>
Matt Corallo [ARCHIVE] /
npub1e4…jxmcu
2023-06-07 17:50:16
in reply to nevent1q…m04g
Author Public Key
npub1e46n428mcyfwznl7nlsf6d3s7rhlwm9x3cmkuqzt3emmdpadmkaqqjxmcuSeen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 17:50:16Event JSON
{
"id": "7bb06a5a918bf73c9d07a49fc4970a4130c1d5316900116d9488e7c2acc4641d",
"pubkey": "cd753aa8fbc112e14ffe9fe09d3630f0eff76ca68e376e004b8e77b687adddba",
"created_at": 1686160216,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"37fe3d2b857e9599a14c87e34f77dee62e90bb6721200fbd7752c60823834c1e",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"23b3cc656ed8f41d676cee419b843f265a21f9043e62cc73ec85932e931b35d1",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-05-06\n📝 Original message:Thanks Greg for the testing!\n\nNote that to those who are reviewing the doc, a few minor tweaks to\nwording and clarification have been made to the git version, so please\nreview there.\n\nOn 05/03/16 05:02, Gregory Maxwell wrote:\n\u003e On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev\n\u003e \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e Hi all,\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e The following is a BIP-formatted design spec for compact block relay\n\u003e\u003e designed to limit on wire bytes during block relay. You can find the\n\u003e\u003e latest version of this document at\n\u003e\u003e https://github.com/TheBlueMatt/bips/blob/master/bip-TODO.mediawiki.\n\u003e \n\u003e Thanks Matt!\n\u003e \n\u003e I've been testing this for a couple weeks (in various forms). I've\n\u003e been getting over 96% reduction in block-bytes sent. I don't have a\n\u003e good metric for it, but bandwidth spikes are greatly reduced. The\n\u003e largest blocktxn message I've seen on a node that has been up for at\n\u003e least a day is 475736 bytes. 94% of the blocks less than 100kb must be\n\u003e sent in total.\n\u003e \n\u003e In the opportunistic mode my measurements are showing 73% of blocks\n\u003e transferred with 0.5 RTT even without prediction, 87% if up to 4\n\u003e additional transactions are predicted, and 91% for 30 transactions (my\n\u003e rough estimate for the 10k maximum prediction suggested in the BIP.\n\u003e",
"sig": "53e8893efb50bcad6de46ab99d0929a6141ac6d01a7988fe1b78883e51c8b40162888191d6f181e8ce3e43cde5b9c39e0f9084a308daa932aaa768affe54e4fa"
}