Apparently all you support is pedos. Bear in mind your arguments so far have been that you don't think censoring illegal content is a good thing and then that you think pedos should just be allowed access to child sexual assault material. To me it sounds like you're just trying to protect your own sick interests at this point.
And to be clear, people don't have to subscribe to free speech absolutism to be free. We choose to live in societies and we agree to abide by common rules. In the same way you can't bash someone head in with a brick without repercussions, there are some things you can't spread without repercussions.
The problem is that you free speech absolutist types take a broad concept of being able to say something out loud then you try to apply that to publishing and data transmission, things it was never designed to apply to, and you apply it to any company rather than just the government which is what free speech laws apply to.
I'll make it clear. Free speech does not include the right to distribute child sexual assault material. If you think it does then you are a pedo and should hand yourself and your computer into the authorities.
PsychoVagabondX /
npub16r…znp07
2023-10-22 10:33:10
in reply to nevent1q…yywc
Author Public Key
npub16rnwgfqa06nrr0u34p6zufpyy46vjxns8xgjjxftuxuvuzz0ckxq3znp07Published at
2023-10-22 10:33:10Event JSON
{
"id": "7ce8d79b7195add4b144241efcb04c0ed25283d085725912993cf63e7df70120",
"pubkey": "d0e6e4241d7ea631bf91a8742e24242574c91a70399129192be1b8ce084fc58c",
"created_at": 1697970790,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"b94059f6a089ac4b3102ce8ea84441c3c098b8b6db78286293d00e9e638545cf",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"68a7803659fe3c709290dd396ab01959a0e4ab0a8c6b2bcd072f9775671beb28",
"wss://nos.lol/",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"3d31f7c911f457f2dc1debdef13c5313bc3a60af2ced854da92ed9b466603064"
],
[
"p",
"f844fd32b91e6d0753944305e5053289bc8ea2472bcd16db95f961fe787f4256"
]
],
"content": "Apparently all you support is pedos. Bear in mind your arguments so far have been that you don't think censoring illegal content is a good thing and then that you think pedos should just be allowed access to child sexual assault material. To me it sounds like you're just trying to protect your own sick interests at this point.\n\nAnd to be clear, people don't have to subscribe to free speech absolutism to be free. We choose to live in societies and we agree to abide by common rules. In the same way you can't bash someone head in with a brick without repercussions, there are some things you can't spread without repercussions.\n\nThe problem is that you free speech absolutist types take a broad concept of being able to say something out loud then you try to apply that to publishing and data transmission, things it was never designed to apply to, and you apply it to any company rather than just the government which is what free speech laws apply to. \n\nI'll make it clear. Free speech does not include the right to distribute child sexual assault material. If you think it does then you are a pedo and should hand yourself and your computer into the authorities.",
"sig": "80ff067bcf1d2ae84a147b1fc2dd0e294bd157c8ca6ba8cfcd0a3c53ec903eb0a219a1f67fd415ec257ea85843cc3505ce7d5492ac6870a75f6f0e9b529d01af"
}