📅 Original date posted:2013-06-14
📝 Original message:Timestamping ("proof of existence") doesn't need a coin at all. Just collect
all the hashes you need timestamped into a PoE merkle tree and add that to the
merged mining MT. It's pretty simple and straightforward, just needs someone
to implement it.
On Saturday, June 15, 2013 12:09:09 AM Dennison Bertram wrote:
> Have your seen 'proof of existence'? It's basically a bitcoin notary
> service that proves a document existed before it gets inserted into the
> blockchain. While a good idea- you could argue that it's blockchain spam
> as well- especially if one were to adapt it to high volumes in the future
> for notarizing permanently things like tweets (for example) or combining
> it with something like colored coins. These are great ideas, but maybe
> better suited to a proto bitcoin without needing to fashion a brand new
> coin.
Luke-Jr [ARCHIVE] /
npub1dt…u7wrs
2023-06-07 15:03:23
in reply to nevent1q…klhq
Author Public Key
npub1dtr22xd42nv07un2xq0rmtkqkjylgsmexau0anxxafa9xmmn2ncshu7wrsPublished at
2023-06-07 15:03:23Event JSON
{
"id": "76b247a04ef8c196f36711ac670704c930f23282b179ad87e248322ec112f9cb",
"pubkey": "6ac6a519b554d8ff726a301e3daec0b489f443793778feccc6ea7a536f7354f1",
"created_at": 1686150203,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"ea8936b4ce5d9e122cdb75232acd4ebd7b7ee03eb03b462c06b166164b755914",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"5103af2d052cafc0e0710257b438557f5a7ca2e3ee09e9b073c6bdf10ee91000",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"7439f645cbb7609f8004455ee8f4719859976d231379696a84b11bf2ead469ed"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2013-06-14\n📝 Original message:Timestamping (\"proof of existence\") doesn't need a coin at all. Just collect \nall the hashes you need timestamped into a PoE merkle tree and add that to the \nmerged mining MT. It's pretty simple and straightforward, just needs someone \nto implement it.\n\nOn Saturday, June 15, 2013 12:09:09 AM Dennison Bertram wrote:\n\u003e Have your seen 'proof of existence'? It's basically a bitcoin notary\n\u003e service that proves a document existed before it gets inserted into the\n\u003e blockchain. While a good idea- you could argue that it's blockchain spam\n\u003e as well- especially if one were to adapt it to high volumes in the future\n\u003e for notarizing permanently things like tweets (for example) or combining\n\u003e it with something like colored coins. These are great ideas, but maybe\n\u003e better suited to a proto bitcoin without needing to fashion a brand new\n\u003e coin.",
"sig": "1b56317f552bec421d00b8c75cd131983b1df75e8b463881d25af749cf36bc9e54eb41c13aa7be7094690dc4c6c659990d3274180bf9d6d4e48e2740ce4abcff"
}