đ
Original date posted:2017-07-12
đ Original message:Just a quick note in favor of an updated roadmap (some may object to that
label, but I think it's fine). When you and your friends are planning your
weekly movie outing, it's very helpful to have someone who knows the group,
knows what films are playing, checks people's preferences, mails around
proposals, updates with corrections, keeps a list of choices for future
weeks, etc. (Certainly not the same as imposing an agenda, except when the
coordinator gets pushy.)
Core veterans like those on this thread are well placed to compile (not
decree) such a document - basically an informed view of what looks likely
to get rough consensus, and in what order. *Of course* some will dispute
the priorities etc, but it's my experience that if everyone virtuously
refrains from this kind of coordination effort, often the weekend rolls by
without a film.
Agreed that specific deadlines often create more problems than they solve,
but even without dates, clarifying priorities (eg, segwit before HF) is
still useful.
All this is aside from the fact that I have many criticisms of the "movies
chosen" so far and the criteria used to choose them - another thread
(basically, I support an interpretation of "consensus" that takes more note
of non-dev constituents). The consensus-marshaling effort is still
important, and appreciated.
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Paul Sztorc via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> And please try to avoid going off-topic -- this is supposed to be about
> the idea of a new roadmap.
>
> Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170712/516ee858/attachment.html>;
Jacob Eliosoff [ARCHIVE] /
npub1mlâŚ4yf8d
2023-06-07 18:04:24
in reply to nevent1qâŚgq4e
Author Public Key
npub1mlpmsc5sm93tw2fp2dhhuwmxcqm59wz6hjg5g3afq5rucfll3f9sh4yf8dPublished at
2023-06-07 18:04:24Event JSON
{
"id": "73cfb41c9dd89cd9048ea191f8fb788be3727be1fdb91ee02ab8939ff99f1a3f",
"pubkey": "dfc3b86290d962b72921536f7e3b66c03742b85abc914447a90507cc27ff8a4b",
"created_at": 1686161064,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"0dbbb3b4fffe9287047e58a8fa04c4b6c95589f2269ea5553f7cb2691feb3b03",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"73df565b8e5043936d534fc269907f00839fe11d4f75c95843882efb2a897bab",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"7ac0bd39b854f24cbf067103758f3a9d398c23832d6d75824d190ae35c6c23be"
]
],
"content": "đ
Original date posted:2017-07-12\nđ Original message:Just a quick note in favor of an updated roadmap (some may object to that\nlabel, but I think it's fine). When you and your friends are planning your\nweekly movie outing, it's very helpful to have someone who knows the group,\nknows what films are playing, checks people's preferences, mails around\nproposals, updates with corrections, keeps a list of choices for future\nweeks, etc. (Certainly not the same as imposing an agenda, except when the\ncoordinator gets pushy.)\n\nCore veterans like those on this thread are well placed to compile (not\ndecree) such a document - basically an informed view of what looks likely\nto get rough consensus, and in what order. *Of course* some will dispute\nthe priorities etc, but it's my experience that if everyone virtuously\nrefrains from this kind of coordination effort, often the weekend rolls by\nwithout a film.\n\nAgreed that specific deadlines often create more problems than they solve,\nbut even without dates, clarifying priorities (eg, segwit before HF) is\nstill useful.\n\nAll this is aside from the fact that I have many criticisms of the \"movies\nchosen\" so far and the criteria used to choose them - another thread\n(basically, I support an interpretation of \"consensus\" that takes more note\nof non-dev constituents). The consensus-marshaling effort is still\nimportant, and appreciated.\n\n\nOn Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Paul Sztorc via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e And please try to avoid going off-topic -- this is supposed to be about\n\u003e the idea of a new roadmap.\n\u003e\n\u003e Paul\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170712/516ee858/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "e2afe6c340b63b8ee769bd455b28ec1ef6a5ba247279eba641d2731c9a947914361d4dbb210336662b05f9fd3b6e48083dbc5d60dada112f497c6923a4e211c9"
}