dvdc on Nostr: Yes, but I'm not convinced that liberalism can be saved. Liberalism's chief virtue is ...
Yes, but I'm not convinced that liberalism can be saved. Liberalism's chief virtue is tolerance, which aims to ‘liberate’ people from any sources of intolerance (i.e., authority outside the state, cultural norms, family structures, religion, etc.). Pluralistic liberalism is a contradiction because liberalism demands totality.
We see society at the logical conclusion of liberalism, which is inherently unstable because of the egalitarian veil it tries to put over the differences between the few and the many. I think the post-liberals make better analyses of current affairs and arguments for where we should go via classical mixed constitutions between the few and the many.
Published at
2024-08-13 00:06:17Event JSON
{
"id": "7f0363e2667ef0d15b8b1dbdcedd675c5ce5a9a84adc70b49e5a020dfa05de79",
"pubkey": "6b1b8dac34ffc61d464dfeef00e4a84a604e172ef6391fb629293d6f1666148c",
"created_at": 1723507577,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"fca8bce58d846be80d3df6c48bddf87510956180863c7541d232f9f4aa80e55c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"70122128273bdc07af9be7725fa5c4bc0fc146866bec38d44360dc4bc6cc18b9"
]
],
"content": "Yes, but I'm not convinced that liberalism can be saved. Liberalism's chief virtue is tolerance, which aims to ‘liberate’ people from any sources of intolerance (i.e., authority outside the state, cultural norms, family structures, religion, etc.). Pluralistic liberalism is a contradiction because liberalism demands totality.\n\nWe see society at the logical conclusion of liberalism, which is inherently unstable because of the egalitarian veil it tries to put over the differences between the few and the many. I think the post-liberals make better analyses of current affairs and arguments for where we should go via classical mixed constitutions between the few and the many.",
"sig": "19a6cb006cbcd727e1bfe67de0a628391fd4729db4d9de7a2dd07257e529c98a71b8d85196baf7a5892fe4b14c7f0d65484ce03c00b5424bfb651c95c8e25f58"
}