📅 Original date posted:2012-11-26
📝 Original message:Supporting DNSSEC/DANE in the future when they are widely deployed is a great idea.
Note that the x509chain field is 'repeated', and any repeated field may have zero entries. So I would suggest supporting other PKI systems in the future by adding optional new fields (for maximum compatibility or security merchants might want to include both a x509chain AND
--
Gavin Andresen
Gavin [ARCHIVE] /
npub1fv…ed8pr
2023-06-07 10:40:00
in reply to nevent1q…75a3
Author Public Key
npub1fvd9jpjgn33ry4tt663e3fpsw5zysxzuacumergtweqhsa6ac9gqred8prPublished at
2023-06-07 10:40:00Event JSON
{
"id": "7d7e2a6b61b3938de5e9b6a5afab6688dbcabc47a21989e2b62ef572d56841ee",
"pubkey": "4b1a5906489c6232556bd6a398a430750448185cee39bc8d0b764178775dc150",
"created_at": 1686134400,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"f5f2400f8aa8a7067be3d080f096fd7cbfeecdd6e589c178b85b63a9338150a5",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"3572fb72084270793c4e3360d6bb0dc05f02b9334456a1f6d218cbba23d1d228",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"308e0d1efb1707ac6b92cd0b19c304882b3919f4bd59336c4a718c159bdcf63b"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2012-11-26\n📝 Original message:Supporting DNSSEC/DANE in the future when they are widely deployed is a great idea.\n\nNote that the x509chain field is 'repeated', and any repeated field may have zero entries. So I would suggest supporting other PKI systems in the future by adding optional new fields (for maximum compatibility or security merchants might want to include both a x509chain AND \n\n--\nGavin Andresen",
"sig": "4db8175695d63eaf3846f51fb21b71a7b31aa58bd8a95c8df396980af8c531ac0c15fe61fe8dfc784b95796ee8ef15ae6f4c2655b1ef2777091221fe6bb7de23"
}