Slashdot (RSS Feed) on Nostr: **AI Coding Competition Pits GPT-4 Against Bard, GitHub Co-Pilot, Bing, and Claude+** ...
**AI Coding Competition Pits GPT-4 Against Bard, GitHub Co-Pilot, Bing, and Claude+**
HackerNoon tested five AI bots on coding problems from Leetcode.com — GPT-4, GitHub Co-Pilot, Bard, Bing, and Claude+.
There's some interesting commentary on the strengths and weaknesses of each one -- and of course, the code that they ultimately output. The final results?
\[GPT-4's submission\] passes all tests. It beat 47% of submissions on runtime and 8% on memory. GPT-4 is highly versatile in generating code for various programming languages and applications. Some of the caveats are that it takes much longer to get a response. API usage is also a lot more expensive and costs could ramp up quickly. Overall it got the answer right and passed the test.
\[Bing's submission\] passed all the tests. It beat 47% of submissions on runtime and 37% on memory. This code looks a lot simpler than what GPT-4 generated. It beat GPT-4 on memory and it used less code! Bing seems to have the most efficient code so far, however, it gave a very short explanation of how it solved it. Nonetheless, best so far.
But both Bard and Claude+ failed the submission test (badly), while GitHub Copilot "passes all the tests. It scored better than 30% of submissions on runtime and 37% on memory."
(
http://twitter.com/home?status=AI+Coding+Competition+Pits+GPT-4+Against+Bard%2C+GitHub+Co-Pilot%2C+Bing%2C+and+Claude%2B%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fdevelopers.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F23%2F04%2F30%2F0454245%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter)
(
http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fdevelopers.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F23%2F04%2F30%2F0454245%2Fai-coding-competition-pits-gpt-4-against-bard-github-co-pilot-bing-and-claude%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook)
Read more of this story (
https://developers.slashdot.org/story/23/04/30/0454245/ai-coding-competition-pits-gpt-4-against-bard-github-co-pilot-bing-and-claude?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&utm_medium=feed) at Slashdot.
https://developers.slashdot.org/story/23/04/30/0454245/ai-coding-competition-pits-gpt-4-against-bard-github-co-pilot-bing-and-claude?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feedPublished at
2023-04-30 11:34:00Event JSON
{
"id": "7d527275b92bda47d44a43dc0c2c128b754520c7b8d3d9d0d23f64323e4a31f3",
"pubkey": "933d97b01272a03d281deaec23d446a3f9c72c8dee83e30081f0db191c7e20e7",
"created_at": 1682854440,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "**AI Coding Competition Pits GPT-4 Against Bard, GitHub Co-Pilot, Bing, and Claude+**\n\nHackerNoon tested five AI bots on coding problems from Leetcode.com — GPT-4, GitHub Co-Pilot, Bard, Bing, and Claude+.\n\nThere's some interesting commentary on the strengths and weaknesses of each one -- and of course, the code that they ultimately output. The final results?\n\n\\[GPT-4's submission\\] passes all tests. It beat 47% of submissions on runtime and 8% on memory. GPT-4 is highly versatile in generating code for various programming languages and applications. Some of the caveats are that it takes much longer to get a response. API usage is also a lot more expensive and costs could ramp up quickly. Overall it got the answer right and passed the test.\n\n\\[Bing's submission\\] passed all the tests. It beat 47% of submissions on runtime and 37% on memory. This code looks a lot simpler than what GPT-4 generated. It beat GPT-4 on memory and it used less code! Bing seems to have the most efficient code so far, however, it gave a very short explanation of how it solved it. Nonetheless, best so far.\n\nBut both Bard and Claude+ failed the submission test (badly), while GitHub Copilot \"passes all the tests. It scored better than 30% of submissions on runtime and 37% on memory.\"\n\nhttps://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png (http://twitter.com/home?status=AI+Coding+Competition+Pits+GPT-4+Against+Bard%2C+GitHub+Co-Pilot%2C+Bing%2C+and+Claude%2B%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fdevelopers.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F23%2F04%2F30%2F0454245%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter)https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png (http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fdevelopers.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F23%2F04%2F30%2F0454245%2Fai-coding-competition-pits-gpt-4-against-bard-github-co-pilot-bing-and-claude%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook)\n\nRead more of this story (https://developers.slashdot.org/story/23/04/30/0454245/ai-coding-competition-pits-gpt-4-against-bard-github-co-pilot-bing-and-claude?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon\u0026utm_medium=feed) at Slashdot.\n\nhttps://developers.slashdot.org/story/23/04/30/0454245/ai-coding-competition-pits-gpt-4-against-bard-github-co-pilot-bing-and-claude?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon\u0026utm_medium=feed",
"sig": "caf9a0a2dfcec92858f2329a20d265cc9043a215934d8cc37cd88f21bce698c84550c43aacc40afcb65a3ecca8215fa954fa094a01de7808e6e249147a4434ec"
}
