Wladimir [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: ๐
Original date posted:2014-02-24 ๐ Original message:On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at ...
๐
Original date posted:2014-02-24
๐ Original message:On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at bitpay.com> wrote:
> A common IRC proposal seems to lean towards reducing that from 80.
> I'll leave it to the crowd to argue about size from there. I do think
> regular transactions should have the ability to include some metadata.
>
I'd be in favor of bringing it down to 40 for 0.9.
That'd be enough for <8 byte header/identifier><32 byte hash>.
80, as the standard line length, is almost asking for "insert your graffiti
message here". I also see no need for 64 bytes hashes such as SHA512 in the
context of bitcoin, as that only offers 256-bit security (at most) in the
first place.
And if this is not abused, these kind of transactions become popular, and
more space is really needed, the limit can always be increased in a future
version.
Wladimir
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140224/4ca2e66e/attachment.html>
Published at
2023-06-07 15:13:56Event JSON
{
"id": "7a678e9c9c79b82fc82042053306aecdf7d370e6358e95112e414c78dd1406b3",
"pubkey": "30217b018a47b99ed4c20399b44b02f70ec4f58ed77a2814a563fa28322ef722",
"created_at": 1686150836,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"1ef870aa2080d76066b16301e94316a8cf8557aa7768e48cc4c5664289bfd14e",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"0146a8050005bff3bdb5d34cb581a8754d939733975bd860b58f9eeac4617000",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"b25e10e25d470d9b215521b50da0dfe7a209bec7fedeb53860c3e180ffdc8c11"
]
],
"content": "๐
Original date posted:2014-02-24\n๐ Original message:On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Jeff Garzik \u003cjgarzik at bitpay.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e A common IRC proposal seems to lean towards reducing that from 80.\n\u003e I'll leave it to the crowd to argue about size from there. I do think\n\u003e regular transactions should have the ability to include some metadata.\n\u003e\n\nI'd be in favor of bringing it down to 40 for 0.9.\n\nThat'd be enough for \u003c8 byte header/identifier\u003e\u003c32 byte hash\u003e.\n\n80, as the standard line length, is almost asking for \"insert your graffiti\nmessage here\". I also see no need for 64 bytes hashes such as SHA512 in the\ncontext of bitcoin, as that only offers 256-bit security (at most) in the\nfirst place.\n\nAnd if this is not abused, these kind of transactions become popular, and\nmore space is really needed, the limit can always be increased in a future\nversion.\n\nWladimir\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140224/4ca2e66e/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "4d5e15d7239bfb5d3afcba0e5ec9ef93c5280c60fdcf7eea5eef21c2a0cabc4972f4b9b3a1389925b1222d9772dbde20cb996a736333a4fb922e7acc9b749447"
}