📅 Original date posted:2015-08-18
📝 Original message:Am 18.08.2015 um 11:15 schrieb Warren Togami Jr.:
> I honestly don't understand your position, but I get the sense that you
> are suggesting Satoshi wouldn't be welcome to return if he wanted to be
> active in development again?
Who am I? Personally I have zero objection if the creator steps in. I
think he would be highly welcome by the most people. At first I had the
impression that the email was a fake, but maybe I was wrong. At the
moment I think: Maybe it's even the best if we do not know exactly
whether it was Satoshi or not.
Unanimity is mission critical for Bitcoin and must be an absolute
priority. If not the vast majority is in favor for a fork, then the fork
should be avoided until a consensus is found. Even if it takes until the
cows come home.
But it is very likely now that it will come to a fork. No matter which
site will win, this will produce a lot of humiliated people at the end.
That's not good and leads to bitterness on both sites.
- oliver
Oliver Egginger [ARCHIVE] /
npub182…nlkws
2023-06-07 15:47:26
in reply to nevent1q…893v
Author Public Key
npub182pe36hcvp2va069x068fcqt7w38fhdhrfkmhxdnlqausddvmucq3nlkwsPublished at
2023-06-07 15:47:26Event JSON
{
"id": "7a5139bd5cd1cfa331ee524e854ea53aa35247c951dcbcd1e058603360ba3b99",
"pubkey": "3a8398eaf86054cebf4533f474e00bf3a274ddb71a6dbb99b3f83bc835acdf30",
"created_at": 1686152846,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"c2ea875b0594d5635a2a5ab9721c10059f40c62d11975dcc679e649aa5cf3f34",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"3df6fc6ef13ae6832372f28f80af8d2a04707dfe9ba39a6b61af4298be2331db",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"417cca0d748239d44acfc6578b0ef7d8e376e5a7e558ecd2d9006f9f13255a13"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-18\n📝 Original message:Am 18.08.2015 um 11:15 schrieb Warren Togami Jr.:\n\u003e I honestly don't understand your position, but I get the sense that you\n\u003e are suggesting Satoshi wouldn't be welcome to return if he wanted to be\n\u003e active in development again?\n\nWho am I? Personally I have zero objection if the creator steps in. I\nthink he would be highly welcome by the most people. At first I had the\nimpression that the email was a fake, but maybe I was wrong. At the\nmoment I think: Maybe it's even the best if we do not know exactly\nwhether it was Satoshi or not.\n\nUnanimity is mission critical for Bitcoin and must be an absolute\npriority. If not the vast majority is in favor for a fork, then the fork\nshould be avoided until a consensus is found. Even if it takes until the\ncows come home.\n\nBut it is very likely now that it will come to a fork. No matter which\nsite will win, this will produce a lot of humiliated people at the end.\nThat's not good and leads to bitterness on both sites.\n\n- oliver",
"sig": "0594fedc96306ca82c059d3993011752a8c755635420580a55cd90eace17e8bc85cf08bea07405949c3cc92f481f0677944a0cbe5ed3169923b7fbde281cee31"
}