If you're willing to indulge me, I have other Qs for you. Happy to send ya some sats for your time.
I rewatched your chat with Marty tonight and re-read some list posts.
- At one point you mentioned you could do something similar (w/o a SF IIUC) with Package Relay & Ephemeral Anchors. If that's the case, would it be pretty close to what you envision with OP_VAULT or would something be lacking?
(I do realize these are both non-existant ATM)
- Given the difficulty of implementing changes to CORE, as well as your neutral stance on activation method, would you consider a UASF and if so, is that a ton of extra work for someone or just a quick fork+merge and good to go?
Apologies if these are super-noob. I try to live in the weeds but am very much still finding my way around. Haha.
Thx in advance, cheers.
Juan 🍁
npub1r3…npk7y
2023-09-22 05:27:26
in reply to nevent1q…vq9w
Author Public Key
npub1r3hrmdf7r62vwmrgxlx3trwky2ntklze6hz9crsesxvt7m3c7l7qynpk7yPublished at
2023-09-22 05:27:26Event JSON
{
"id": "779000031846a6094d04207bafb68ec544778ffe331827ac051a8ec010c3f1cb",
"pubkey": "1c6e3db53e1e94c76c6837cd158dd622a6bb7c59d5c45c0e198198bf6e38f7fc",
"created_at": 1695360446,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"797d4d7c72451335c6e1450e911d22ee6dfb6a0022c10ecbbef21cba590de0ec",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"e708417e82c5302f863dfc415b85c40183822755583a6459bbcccc13bd985d16"
],
[
"e",
"827d3cfa2638c900b828b5203167d8005ef46ef01859bf9e5130ee0e6e65c493",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"5f69082cc20dbdd25b320eb0c3e79f3bf6a1c92e60623449cf3224b0fa11eda9"
]
],
"content": "If you're willing to indulge me, I have other Qs for you. Happy to send ya some sats for your time. \n\nI rewatched your chat with Marty tonight and re-read some list posts. \n\n- At one point you mentioned you could do something similar (w/o a SF IIUC) with Package Relay \u0026 Ephemeral Anchors. If that's the case, would it be pretty close to what you envision with OP_VAULT or would something be lacking? \n\n(I do realize these are both non-existant ATM)\n\n- Given the difficulty of implementing changes to CORE, as well as your neutral stance on activation method, would you consider a UASF and if so, is that a ton of extra work for someone or just a quick fork+merge and good to go? \n\nApologies if these are super-noob. I try to live in the weeds but am very much still finding my way around. Haha. \n\nThx in advance, cheers. ",
"sig": "80c06d18e9406040776f8aa8143ccc927f9e842b1f4d2a5a4a73df992df815242b0153ebf090688b057fdc4bb0b643417c7574cc55bdb85c7cbb2cc73beaea68"
}