exosome ⚡⚡ on Nostr: >Any kind of sexual contact without consent is a boundary. Who made that boundary? ...

>Any kind of sexual contact without consent is a boundary.

Who made that boundary? 😆 Even animals recognize that because it's nature. Big elephant doesn't try to have sex with elephant baby. It's an instinct and empathy. Psychopaths don't have that.


>But should we not advance in technology and maybe even gene research?

Glad you mention it. Another thing you never verified. Stop you right there, Genes don't exist either. https://poa.st/objects/be0eab08-aeab-456c-84a3-f709ff863df0
No one knows how heredity works. It's human to explore, to abuse is another thing.

80% of modern biology was developed by Rockefellers. (bored to remind their race) and is unscientific including cancer being disease. Already told you there is no such thing as a "cure". That's marketing word.
Diseases don't exist. There inly allostasis. Cancer is not disease but a reaction, removal of toxins. It's chemo-holokaust that kills not cancer. You will love which race is responsible for that. https://web.archive.org/web/20190116084232/https://www.psiram.com/de/index.php/Ryke_Geerd_Hamer_und_Antisemitismus#cite_note-3

"one with the Germanic New Medicine - only for Jews, with which one survives cancer to 99%, and

a 98% fatal chemo-therapy torture - for gentiles only, with only 2% of patients surviving."

https://web.archive.org/web/20110815053742/http://dr-rykegeerdhamer.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=362&Itemid=76

You are arguing something I never disputed.

>Should we not try to cure cancer once and for all?

Chasing red herring.


>Of course you might be able to use that research also to create something that causes a fast killing cancer. But that should be the real challenge, the moral responsibility. The knowledge that we are better than animals and should act accordingly.

False dilemma.


>No, CPE is the damage a virus causes in a cell, or how it's measured.

How did you verify something else doesn't cause CPE? Who decides "how it's measured"? Certainly not scientific method that requires control experiment which they don't do because it refutes that assumption. https://poa.st/objects/ffaa395e-3faa-4fdf-94b4-1e3bb081386f You don't understand at all what are you talking about. It's all on that site refuted with their own sources.

>The virus is shown, I'd even pay for you to see it with your own eyes.

That would be easy money for me, thing is you have burden of proof and you will get paid. https://samueleckert.net/isolate-truth-fund/

https://viroliegy.com/category/no-virus-challenge/ right after you PROVE what no one have yet, because it can't be. I know what you think "virus" looks like. How did you verify it's the alleged "virus" with scientific method when no one isolated it and shown to cause the alleged symptoms?
It's virologists themselved who admit they never isolated a "virus" but usually only when you send them legally binding FOI. I don't need to refute further. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/


>Btw, if you have any questions just ask. But I can only speak for myself and not for the so called trans community.

When you grow your hair.


>I don't understand your answer to this, it's not a virus.

Ad hoc fallacy


>I love the size of the reader. not many know that you can upload your own files on it, you just need the text from somewhere 🤷‍♂️

Don't follow, what reader?


There are many subcultures identifying as skinheads. Gangs. That's exactly the problem. There are also those that call themselves Nazi but only know them trough jewish Holywood and you should know then they are not NS, often too stupid to understand it, but help demonize it and play political theater. https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Skinhead_subculture
Not everyone with shaved head is a "skinhead".