Martin Sustrik [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š
Original date posted:2013-10-22 š Original message:On 21/10/13 21:47, Luke-Jr ...
š
Original date posted:2013-10-22
š Original message:On 21/10/13 21:47, Luke-Jr wrote:
> On Monday, October 21, 2013 7:38:37 PM Jean-Paul Kogelman wrote:
>> 1) Should the protocol specification page also be codified into BIP(s)?
>
> Probably wouldn't hurt, but it'd likely need a rewrite in a more modular and
> formal form.
I wanted to have a look at how the whole Bitcoin thing works recently.
Being a distributed application, I've searched for the protocol spec.
What I found were two wiki pages (Protocol & ProtocolRules) that looked
more like notes someone wrote down while implementing the application.
Have I missed something? Is there any effort underway trying to produce
a decent spec? If not so, I am willing to help with that.
Martin
Published at
2023-06-07 15:07:44Event JSON
{
"id": "77c557f338743a69dd5c0e3b63c69054c1438477cdec0e2f4a040072a92ad78c",
"pubkey": "a07382f2047b309ebb8303d291bbe36556308187afdeaea697a464e7d3a93c53",
"created_at": 1686150464,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"7825845c40e7246842c64e1640ea39dcb04d6d8f430fae7ba311b465db0e4d0f",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"c1af472282027d9de664293ec3ea9e6a6d43d407a4cfed388eb6fe23623283bd",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"5fe5851f9f99926d9a913aebd6817f05f7a3c3382dcc0af915e571f03e0a3dfd"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2013-10-22\nš Original message:On 21/10/13 21:47, Luke-Jr wrote:\n\u003e On Monday, October 21, 2013 7:38:37 PM Jean-Paul Kogelman wrote:\n\u003e\u003e 1) Should the protocol specification page also be codified into BIP(s)?\n\u003e\n\u003e Probably wouldn't hurt, but it'd likely need a rewrite in a more modular and\n\u003e formal form.\n\nI wanted to have a look at how the whole Bitcoin thing works recently. \nBeing a distributed application, I've searched for the protocol spec. \nWhat I found were two wiki pages (Protocol \u0026 ProtocolRules) that looked \nmore like notes someone wrote down while implementing the application.\n\nHave I missed something? Is there any effort underway trying to produce \na decent spec? If not so, I am willing to help with that.\n\nMartin",
"sig": "3464ee8e0684c0f0db8c42a0db57e43499ed0df4d62cbdbb47c244df59078e69f6cae53de22e09681900ced887d4cd64303b59819de26ea4c601ef3ae085d2df"
}