maybe this is a hot take but i think it would be a worse look for bitcoin magazine to demonize inscriptions and not engage with it.
inscriptions follow consensus rules and are a part of bitcoin and the culture (like it or not), which is what the magazine reports on.
taking a hard stance against something that is intrinsic to the protocol would be weirdly biased and authoritarian coming from a magazine whose mandate is to report on bitcoin and anything related to it.
i’m sure they’d platform opposing views on inscriptions if anyone wanted to offer a compelling and objective argument, but it seems like most people just want to screech and complain.
MT / MT⚡️
npub1nq…jy5lh
2023-04-16 23:49:10
Author Public Key
npub1nqc4zvkk4wx0usz082qydwpnd42979y5k93mdmn2vwguttkzfrysqjy5lhPublished at
2023-04-16 23:49:10Event JSON
{
"id": "a16f354cb5157a946275c267a758dafc81cd20abc6335b2fbfd09507d8a964c4",
"pubkey": "98315132d6ab8cfe404f3a8046b8336d545f1494b163b6ee6a6391c5aec248c9",
"created_at": 1681688950,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "maybe this is a hot take but i think it would be a worse look for bitcoin magazine to demonize inscriptions and not engage with it.\n\ninscriptions follow consensus rules and are a part of bitcoin and the culture (like it or not), which is what the magazine reports on.\n\ntaking a hard stance against something that is intrinsic to the protocol would be weirdly biased and authoritarian coming from a magazine whose mandate is to report on bitcoin and anything related to it.\n\ni’m sure they’d platform opposing views on inscriptions if anyone wanted to offer a compelling and objective argument, but it seems like most people just want to screech and complain.",
"sig": "39e7cfa8402e8ca6e57b468741cd1bb7b7e8d70b7ce31c39a542a1c47dd84efc3c186bc7dfff21b9917f304479b5b101cc45453623614bb001e7456368c4db7e"
}