Gavin Andresen [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š
Original date posted:2014-06-18 š Original message:RE: most of Peter Todd's ...
š
Original date posted:2014-06-18
š Original message:RE: most of Peter Todd's comments:
All of that should be separate pull requests. Big Honking Pull Requests
are harder to review and are more likely to be bike-shedded to death.
RE: not relaying/mining transactions with OP_NOPs so miners don't mine
up-version transactions that are invalid under future-new-rules: I'm not
convinced it is worth adding more code (more potential for bugs) to protect
against something that isn't going to happen because up-version
transactions are non-standard (due to version check) in any case.
In any case, lets make that a separate pull request.
I'm going to take the lack of immediate "That's a Terrible Idea!" as rough
consensus...
--
--
Gavin Andresen
Chief Scientist, Bitcoin Foundation
https://www.bitcoinfoundation.org/-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140618/8221909b/attachment.html>
Published at
2023-06-07 15:23:04Event JSON
{
"id": "a126c9630fcfc31c4ba94c2cfa24fc8248273135045fa108bfc0e6bf2b6a5ae2",
"pubkey": "857f2f78dc1639e711f5ea703a9fc978e22ebd279abdea1861b7daa833512ee4",
"created_at": 1686151384,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"17417d4d019b711f77b6899176af0fd8ebc69e7fc942137a5d14e724419b7980",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"1d09e85d7e245c4cf3153ec8d938aab7107ab08a3eb989201b5e5096a4be70fb",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2014-06-18\nš Original message:RE: most of Peter Todd's comments:\n\nAll of that should be separate pull requests. Big Honking Pull Requests\nare harder to review and are more likely to be bike-shedded to death.\n\n\nRE: not relaying/mining transactions with OP_NOPs so miners don't mine\nup-version transactions that are invalid under future-new-rules: I'm not\nconvinced it is worth adding more code (more potential for bugs) to protect\nagainst something that isn't going to happen because up-version\ntransactions are non-standard (due to version check) in any case.\n\nIn any case, lets make that a separate pull request.\n\nI'm going to take the lack of immediate \"That's a Terrible Idea!\" as rough\nconsensus...\n\n-- \n--\nGavin Andresen\nChief Scientist, Bitcoin Foundation\nhttps://www.bitcoinfoundation.org/\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140618/8221909b/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "640f8f637f2df34161fd81574364c95c3ac7f6ca118ac7ddc7d630eedffef4105f35d63e35a6549be3aad76a251b152917e00d11ee3c21f6ba37a1d9c7235168"
}