📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23
📝 Original message:On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 9:06:26 PM Pavol Rusnak wrote:
> On 04/23/2014 10:54 PM, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> > Would you consider software which scans all accounts as specified by
> > BIP64, but has no user interface option to distinguish them in any
> > way, view them independently, and has no ability to keep the coins
> > apart... compatible with BIP64?
>
> This is not a desired behavior. Do you have any idea how to make it even
> more explicit in the spec? Currently we just have (in Account sectrion):
>
> "This level splits the key space into independent user identities, so
> the wallet never mixes the coins across different accounts."
>
>
> I would like to make it obvious from the spec that if you mix funds
> accross the accounts you are not doing a right thing and you are not
> compliant to the spec.
How do you get the more expected/usual behaviour of mixing funds between
accounts? Only a very niche user base needs funds isolated...
Luke
Luke-Jr [ARCHIVE] /
npub1dt…u7wrs
2023-06-07 15:17:59
in reply to nevent1q…xw5y
Author Public Key
npub1dtr22xd42nv07un2xq0rmtkqkjylgsmexau0anxxafa9xmmn2ncshu7wrsPublished at
2023-06-07 15:17:59Event JSON
{
"id": "a136a35a7fcf058cd9d3aa710579f9d9b59411ac52540f3c54e07b5b6724bae4",
"pubkey": "6ac6a519b554d8ff726a301e3daec0b489f443793778feccc6ea7a536f7354f1",
"created_at": 1686151079,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"3d6a81230db6ab232d8356d3ea7e609f18aff1b8f11502ea70755e81b0de88f9",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"725fe3f7baa3d8b7f536b63462dfce89c2f557241071aff394df1fbf78a7c78c",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"7631397e469f47f3535567311f5f7c17129e0ff2cb253df015e3d92ddfd92c63"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23\n📝 Original message:On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 9:06:26 PM Pavol Rusnak wrote:\n\u003e On 04/23/2014 10:54 PM, Pieter Wuille wrote:\n\u003e \u003e Would you consider software which scans all accounts as specified by\n\u003e \u003e BIP64, but has no user interface option to distinguish them in any\n\u003e \u003e way, view them independently, and has no ability to keep the coins\n\u003e \u003e apart... compatible with BIP64?\n\u003e \n\u003e This is not a desired behavior. Do you have any idea how to make it even\n\u003e more explicit in the spec? Currently we just have (in Account sectrion):\n\u003e \n\u003e \"This level splits the key space into independent user identities, so\n\u003e the wallet never mixes the coins across different accounts.\"\n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e I would like to make it obvious from the spec that if you mix funds\n\u003e accross the accounts you are not doing a right thing and you are not\n\u003e compliant to the spec.\n\nHow do you get the more expected/usual behaviour of mixing funds between \naccounts? Only a very niche user base needs funds isolated...\n\nLuke",
"sig": "90a252280459f41850395a0ee6d810a3728bc4fdc0b143dde88ae95604afe9bb279ab09223c286ed4e08ee326d9724f115a9ff9e3f8a6d79890606929ba0ff38"
}