tl;dr: High reliance on CO₂ removal (#CDR) is bad for CO₂ emissions, as we as land, water, and fertilizer use. But CDR does have a role. Policies should focus on reducing emissions by 80–90%, and CDR can address the remaining 10–20%, especially in hard-to-abate sectors.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-50594-5
David Ho /
npub15w…xenr5
2024-07-29 11:46:24
Author Public Key
npub15w7vk4kt2t9gnw644g8wzq3xv7s4320ldm5rq8jldhl99f2djwfstxenr5Published at
2024-07-29 11:46:24Event JSON
{
"id": "a11e0107dfd6d2e74e987997c34a7ea841e8595c546dab96d092e0a63c376da8",
"pubkey": "a3bccb56cb52ca89bb55aa0ee1022667a158a9ff6ee8301e5f6dfe52a54d9393",
"created_at": 1722253584,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"cdr"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.world/users/davidho/statuses/112869610931523096",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "tl;dr: High reliance on CO₂ removal (#CDR) is bad for CO₂ emissions, as we as land, water, and fertilizer use. But CDR does have a role. Policies should focus on reducing emissions by 80–90%, and CDR can address the remaining 10–20%, especially in hard-to-abate sectors.\n\nhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-50594-5",
"sig": "bad3820c49095172136882913ad0868bb756246c1398d67f0656a2ec804c21b1257475dcca9dec9b2874d360068dd3a7f5436c1f9e4cb781f2fac1a2225c1cc8"
}