📅 Original date posted:2015-08-01
📝 Original message:
> On Aug 1, 2015, at 3:30 AM, Christopher Jamthagen <cjamthagen at gmx.com> wrote:
>
>> Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2015 at 11:57 AM
>> From: "Eric Lombrozo" <elombrozo at gmail.com>
>> To: "Rusty Russell" <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
>> Cc: "Christopher Jamthagen" <cjamthagen at gmx.com>, "lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org" <lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Lightning-dev] Stealing money from a hub?
>
>
>
>> On Jul 30, 2015, at 4:48 PM, Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
>> But I realized yesterday, outsourcing needs a new sighash op mode (or
>> normalized txids), so it's not really something to design a deployable
>> system around today.
>> Can you elaborate on this, Rusty?
>
> We wont know the txid of the revoked commitment transaction until the cheater signs and broadcasts it, thus we cannot pre-sign the stealing transaction for the third party.
Got it. I suppose it would still be possible to have the third party notify you and request a signature when it occurs so that your device doesn’t have to sit and monitor the network and do the filtering, etc...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20150801/45729f48/attachment-0001.sig>;
Eric Lombrozo [ARCHIVE] /
npub1az…t2krq
2023-06-09 12:43:53
in reply to nevent1q…wpe0
Author Public Key
npub1azvhdrf9fu6n0tm7yez4j6zcxcedp2ct6nrcq3z74naqs7kgpk8s5t2krqPublished at
2023-06-09 12:43:53Event JSON
{
"id": "a13df4410a42ceb99221b27aa1bcf1fcb441bcc74c868f5ef52fe1c2cdc2c945",
"pubkey": "e899768d254f3537af7e26455968583632d0ab0bd4c780445eacfa087ac80d8f",
"created_at": 1686314633,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"bd7e3601ad88d218940ec74c685433092458d0efc616b43a30f14fda82e7310e",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"d518e8eb62adbaaf775351eb5c77654c067fde9567e5da8776c971281232fd3a",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"ad104cac8fd9919c65a2df9e910166f2a1513845fdfa37fd10f1063eb12f5254"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-01\n📝 Original message:\n\u003e On Aug 1, 2015, at 3:30 AM, Christopher Jamthagen \u003ccjamthagen at gmx.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \n\u003e\u003e Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2015 at 11:57 AM\n\u003e\u003e From: \"Eric Lombrozo\" \u003celombrozo at gmail.com\u003e\n\u003e\u003e To: \"Rusty Russell\" \u003crusty at rustcorp.com.au\u003e\n\u003e\u003e Cc: \"Christopher Jamthagen\" \u003ccjamthagen at gmx.com\u003e, \"lightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\" \u003clightning-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e\n\u003e\u003e Subject: Re: [Lightning-dev] Stealing money from a hub?\n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e\u003e On Jul 30, 2015, at 4:48 PM, Rusty Russell \u003crusty at rustcorp.com.au\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e But I realized yesterday, outsourcing needs a new sighash op mode (or\n\u003e\u003e normalized txids), so it's not really something to design a deployable\n\u003e\u003e system around today.\n\u003e\u003e Can you elaborate on this, Rusty?\n\u003e \n\u003e We wont know the txid of the revoked commitment transaction until the cheater signs and broadcasts it, thus we cannot pre-sign the stealing transaction for the third party.\n\nGot it. I suppose it would still be possible to have the third party notify you and request a signature when it occurs so that your device doesn’t have to sit and monitor the network and do the filtering, etc...\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 842 bytes\nDesc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20150801/45729f48/attachment-0001.sig\u003e",
"sig": "29a522658987782a6002b50fcec9371d23bbaafb453a9bb3b6e99ad8aa82f457664166dbb1fa0375ea0f2d1224445cd3b70badbbe9b0357a6fdfe17b00488766"
}