moonsettler on Nostr: waxwing can i ask you to take a look at this as well? i have been meaning to ask an ...
Published at
2023-05-04 15:26:49Event JSON
{
"id": "a2754a76060e03ecefbd2b9ee9c190de9e6be023a5140b574ef213269811a86a",
"pubkey": "6a3301c4584124c509efa3efeef04dfa4e7413032797fb79d0207689a085f10c",
"created_at": 1683214009,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"fcede4255321d02f2f1dfa3f8617646064ce1ecfb54748fd3fbec7cfa51435e2",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"6a3301c4584124c509efa3efeef04dfa4e7413032797fb79d0207689a085f10c"
],
[
"p",
"675b84fe75e216ab947c7438ee519ca7775376ddf05dadfba6278bd012e1d728",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"t",
"alice"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1vadcfln4ugt2h9ruwsuwu5vu5am4xaka7pw6m7axy79aqyhp6u5q9knuu7 \ncan i ask you to take a look at this as well?\n\ni have been meaning to ask an opinion on this (second) DLEQ from someone:\nhttps://github.com/moonsettler/cashu/blob/dleq-por/docs/specs/40.md#alice-requests-dleq-proof-on-c\n\nthe idea is that the first DLEQ only proves that k private key was used to create C signature, if the r blinding factor is revealed because normally it only proves the relationship between B' and C'. this second DLEQ however is supposed to be a publicly verifiable proof that a token was signed by Bob without breaking unlinkability.",
"sig": "6f8cf8e28bf7d344827351b752c5f61975db0c2a6116c9fc247191c56f5026c762405958c51900eed2f2ea377eb2ff044f5e331cff57f573f609185a0522535f"
}