đź“… Original date posted:2022-06-30
đź“ť Original message:
> On Jun 28, 2022, at 19:11, Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
>
> Idle question: would it be worthwhile to allow people to opt-in to their
> payments happening more slowly for privacy? At the very least it'd be fine if
> payments done by automation for rebalancing, etc. happened slowly.
Yea, actually, I think that’d be a really cool idea. Obviously you don’t want to hold onto an HTLC for much longer than you have to or you’re DoS’ing yourself using up channel capacity, but most channels spend the vast majority of their time with zero HTLCs, so waiting a second instead of 100ms to batch seems totally reasonable.
Matt Corallo [ARCHIVE] /
npub1e4…jxmcu
2023-06-09 13:06:16
in reply to nevent1q…v6lv
Author Public Key
npub1e46n428mcyfwznl7nlsf6d3s7rhlwm9x3cmkuqzt3emmdpadmkaqqjxmcuPublished at
2023-06-09 13:06:16Event JSON
{
"id": "a35558c0ecdb1a78722f1b923e8a14da4ec8f666312f0d9909a524de23997d38",
"pubkey": "cd753aa8fbc112e14ffe9fe09d3630f0eff76ca68e376e004b8e77b687adddba",
"created_at": 1686315976,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"dc50ebb4a33ebb68559db83f1f909a9de4df76c851710dee0b49ae8b2ad5f61f",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"7c471e8cc880af28eb573efb9f2d921ab0ccbda83157eadcfb296fa503c4ce39",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2022-06-30\n📝 Original message:\n\u003e On Jun 28, 2022, at 19:11, Peter Todd \u003cpete at petertodd.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \n\u003e Idle question: would it be worthwhile to allow people to opt-in to their\n\u003e payments happening more slowly for privacy? At the very least it'd be fine if\n\u003e payments done by automation for rebalancing, etc. happened slowly.\n\nYea, actually, I think that’d be a really cool idea. Obviously you don’t want to hold onto an HTLC for much longer than you have to or you’re DoS’ing yourself using up channel capacity, but most channels spend the vast majority of their time with zero HTLCs, so waiting a second instead of 100ms to batch seems totally reasonable.",
"sig": "c0b220cec57d95465a989a8a68e9389057d60d11a1c656f96f0bd0167ae763a2c1c1a9a9444f574b012a8e53eee42bde4ae349674848b00f420c29764ac83359"
}