📅 Original date posted:2020-12-18
📝 Original message:Thanks for explaining where instructions are lacking.
How does this look?
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1046/files
On Friday 18 December 2020 01:44:27 dentondevelopment wrote:
> Hi Luke,
>
> It looks to have the same motivations and be compatible with
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/253 (if I am reading it correctly).
>
> The only guidance I have on proposing a bip is what is on the readme
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/README.mediawiki
>
> 48 would be fitting if it is unused.
>
> This is still very much a work in progress and there does seem to be
> community support.
>
> Pavol and others have shared relevant info/suggestions which I will be
> using to update the proposal.
>
> Will share again here when the next draft is ready.
>
> Many thanks,
> Fontaine
>
>
> Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>
> On Thursday, December 17, 2020 1:16 AM, Luke Dashjr <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
> > BIP number 48 has not been assigned. Do not self-assign BIP numbers.
> >
> > Is this intended to be compatible with
> > https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/253 ?
> >
> > Luke
> >
> > On Wednesday 16 December 2020 14:10:28 dentondevelopment via bitcoin-dev
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Here is the repo instead of a static link:
> > > https://github.com/Fonta1n3/bips/blob/master/bip-0048.mediawiki
> > > Fontaine
> > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
> > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> > > On Wednesday, December 16, 2020 8:43 PM, dentondevelopment via
> > > bitcoin-dev
> >
> > bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > > I would like to propose bip48 (taking bip44 as inspiration), with the
> > > > purpose of documenting modern multi-sig derivations.
> > > > Please see a rough draft of the proposed bip attached, comments/input
> > > > welcome.
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Fontaine
Luke Dashjr [ARCHIVE] /
npub1tf…rfq0n
2023-06-07 18:27:49
in reply to nevent1q…ed79
Author Public Key
npub1tfk373zg9dnmtvxnpnq7s2dkdgj37rwfj3yrwld7830qltmv8qps8rfq0nPublished at
2023-06-07 18:27:49Event JSON
{
"id": "a71a4609b8fef71f09c5fc0e7ad2da9643f7e43fda74356273c91385cabe4594",
"pubkey": "5a6d1f44482b67b5b0d30cc1e829b66a251f0dc99448377dbe3c5e0faf6c3803",
"created_at": 1686162469,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"6ecf9df29e87c124c48e45a76c9395d58444454a86fd3604f4cda047f4d554d0",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"1a955a0729848dbd4d0c850f0aa3c64bcea337f9abac769333d819c43abffdc1",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"9eb36cf6005e37c6f00ab5d122f07b18e5ac08327195b8b9a7986facbe0e6b4c"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2020-12-18\n📝 Original message:Thanks for explaining where instructions are lacking.\n\nHow does this look?\nhttps://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1046/files\n\nOn Friday 18 December 2020 01:44:27 dentondevelopment wrote:\n\u003e Hi Luke,\n\u003e\n\u003e It looks to have the same motivations and be compatible with\n\u003e https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/253 (if I am reading it correctly).\n\u003e\n\u003e The only guidance I have on proposing a bip is what is on the readme\n\u003e https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/README.mediawiki\n\u003e\n\u003e 48 would be fitting if it is unused.\n\u003e\n\u003e This is still very much a work in progress and there does seem to be\n\u003e community support.\n\u003e\n\u003e Pavol and others have shared relevant info/suggestions which I will be\n\u003e using to update the proposal.\n\u003e\n\u003e Will share again here when the next draft is ready.\n\u003e\n\u003e Many thanks,\n\u003e Fontaine\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.\n\u003e\n\u003e ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐\n\u003e\n\u003e On Thursday, December 17, 2020 1:16 AM, Luke Dashjr \u003cluke at dashjr.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e BIP number 48 has not been assigned. Do not self-assign BIP numbers.\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e Is this intended to be compatible with\n\u003e \u003e https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/253 ?\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e Luke\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e On Wednesday 16 December 2020 14:10:28 dentondevelopment via bitcoin-dev\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e \u003e Here is the repo instead of a static link:\n\u003e \u003e \u003e https://github.com/Fonta1n3/bips/blob/master/bip-0048.mediawiki\n\u003e \u003e \u003e Fontaine\n\u003e \u003e \u003e Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.\n\u003e \u003e \u003e ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐\n\u003e \u003e \u003e On Wednesday, December 16, 2020 8:43 PM, dentondevelopment via\n\u003e \u003e \u003e bitcoin-dev\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote:\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e Hello,\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e I would like to propose bip48 (taking bip44 as inspiration), with the\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e purpose of documenting modern multi-sig derivations.\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e Please see a rough draft of the proposed bip attached, comments/input\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e welcome.\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e Regards,\n\u003e \u003e \u003e \u003e Fontaine",
"sig": "fd5cde96aebe44391f6d0dc886f42f0dbcd704b6606bd7c93255ee0722da4027486af35190ffae023ed01584eb9d35a056093f661839b03f9ba6ac758d718fbb"
}