I haven't used a Passport, but heard it's really good with QRs.
Jade was amazing at reading QRs, but due to its small screen size, reading QRs back from it was a challenge.
I used the same hand-drawn seed that was recognizable by Jade in a matter of seconds, but CC Q couldn't recognize it. I think it's due to a difference in standards, rather than a shortcoming in CC Q's scanning ability.
CC Q is good at reading, but doens't do a good job of producing a scannable QR for signing transactions and this is despite its bigger screen. It is only a small improvement over Jade (classic) when it comes to transaction signing.
I have the hardware for making a SeedSigner (nprofile…w6hy) , but haven't assembled it yet. Once I know, I'll happily share the results.
momotahmasbi / Momo Tahmasbi
npub1he…kkx28
2025-01-26 11:10:22
in reply to nevent1q…y0yr
Author Public Key
npub1heqkxm37d5h7n8sx2gqdez5sxnu39qrylhxnnd66dxpu4e2ufyysdkkx28Published at
2025-01-26 11:10:22Event JSON
{
"id": "a749325f7d0b8f88b0d91a242d0ee9cf30a189df32b0978856ef6bf54c5ad437",
"pubkey": "be41636e3e6d2fe99e065200dc8a9034f9128064fdcd39b75a6983cae55c4909",
"created_at": 1737889822,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"f2c96c97f6419a538f84cf3fa72e2194605e1848096e6e5170cce5b76799d400",
"wss://brb.io",
"mention"
],
[
"e",
"cf8ebbe3a0f7d15fbbe37f9200e698faa931c0f08a2c36a2faa16aa7102e9893",
"wss://feeds.nostr.band/lang/en",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"e9bcbfb45392327d67a6845c689496d6e0383007d5bfda30006d2eb0bcd64d6f",
"wss://feeds.nostr.band/lang/en",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"6867d899ce6b677b89052602cfe04a165f26bb6a1a6390355f497f9ee5cb0796"
],
[
"p",
"be41636e3e6d2fe99e065200dc8a9034f9128064fdcd39b75a6983cae55c4909"
],
[
"p",
"d60397e8a390b41dd17551b04be27ad26831beb6d55a98a1f14d94ec2fe3fde0"
],
[
"r",
"wss://nos.lol/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://nostr-pub.wellorder.net/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://nostr.bitcoiner.social/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://nostr.wine/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://relay.damus.io/"
]
],
"content": "I haven't used a Passport, but heard it's really good with QRs.\nJade was amazing at reading QRs, but due to its small screen size, reading QRs back from it was a challenge.\nI used the same hand-drawn seed that was recognizable by Jade in a matter of seconds, but CC Q couldn't recognize it. I think it's due to a difference in standards, rather than a shortcoming in CC Q's scanning ability.\nCC Q is good at reading, but doens't do a good job of producing a scannable QR for signing transactions and this is despite its bigger screen. It is only a small improvement over Jade (classic) when it comes to transaction signing.\nI have the hardware for making a nostr:nprofile1qyx8wumn8ghj7cnjvghxjmcpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqqg8je9kf0ajpnffclpx087njugv5vp0psjqfdeh9zuxvukmk0xw5qqpfw6hy , but haven't assembled it yet. Once I know, I'll happily share the results.",
"sig": "81cb2d9da1f04850d7c3ee1c1a38bbce24eebf4b63f6a604c335640209b0fdf7b943a9b7adc8a42892c10134de1d36c931e106a218bbdfca7fae713ba2133183"
}