📅 Original date posted:2016-06-21
📝 Original message:On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 08:44:37PM +0000, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> X509 is entrenched, so it should remain supported. PGP might make sense for
> people already using it (it provides no real security for un-WoT-networked
> users), but unforunately, few people use it. Correct me if I'm wrong, but IIRC
> Keybase uses blockchain spam, so definitely not something to be encouraged if
How else would you have keybase accomplish what they're accomplishing, with the
same security model?
--
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160621/ec2235c8/attachment-0001.sig>;
Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] /
npub1m2…a2np2
2023-06-07 17:51:20
in reply to nevent1q…vudf
Author Public Key
npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2Published at
2023-06-07 17:51:20Event JSON
{
"id": "a63ccde1021271125a2b94a854d92375e0c16432b664210091318ce3100e1961",
"pubkey": "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa",
"created_at": 1686160280,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"a5039b46ff53fe0ad45fb1e565b7c7f05169b35d2126c2ee18198a6f3405f573",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"311125baa15f99adac211bcd9db7ffe587bf94db0130e369a3c3f311b222d10b",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-06-21\n📝 Original message:On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 08:44:37PM +0000, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e X509 is entrenched, so it should remain supported. PGP might make sense for \n\u003e people already using it (it provides no real security for un-WoT-networked \n\u003e users), but unforunately, few people use it. Correct me if I'm wrong, but IIRC \n\u003e Keybase uses blockchain spam, so definitely not something to be encouraged if \n\nHow else would you have keybase accomplish what they're accomplishing, with the\nsame security model?\n\n-- \nhttps://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 455 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160621/ec2235c8/attachment-0001.sig\u003e",
"sig": "44a41a78f17560415359c1ef9cdf2b7d57a98968932c9c05aff7f5a7ed797e389ac92f12c59d0c0cb8bcfbb2e3b419945c88bc87bfe28a073260cbedfb126ba0"
}