KisSean on Nostr: Stacks's proof of transfer, seems like a variation of proof of stake. It feels like ...
https://docs.stacks.co/docs/stacks-academy/proof-of-transferStacks's proof of transfer, seems like a variation of proof of stake. It feels like doing the exact same thing as Ethereum except better integration with BTC.
If it's a thing and decentralized to a certain level, there's no need for Ethereum indeed. I only have some doubts about the BTC <-> STX exchange tokenomic model.
But I don't see that happening any time soon, while ETH could just use zk-proof to achieve the same level of integration as it.
#BTC #stacks #ETH #scale #L2
Published at
2023-05-05 22:08:34Event JSON
{
"id": "a5d7d139be1ce6076e3847dae1b25a95bd2052b2e0e1bb8addaaa649222d9115",
"pubkey": "0d6f3fb7f3c83755ea731380516167da6691cea0d7ddf4865505d291687ca343",
"created_at": 1683324514,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"BTC"
],
[
"t",
"stacks"
],
[
"t",
"ETH"
],
[
"t",
"scale"
],
[
"t",
"L2"
]
],
"content": "https://docs.stacks.co/docs/stacks-academy/proof-of-transfer\n\nStacks's proof of transfer, seems like a variation of proof of stake. It feels like doing the exact same thing as Ethereum except better integration with BTC. \n\nIf it's a thing and decentralized to a certain level, there's no need for Ethereum indeed. I only have some doubts about the BTC \u003c-\u003e STX exchange tokenomic model. \n\nBut I don't see that happening any time soon, while ETH could just use zk-proof to achieve the same level of integration as it. \n\n#BTC #stacks #ETH #scale #L2",
"sig": "5ab12e8b1e6dd54e513d745a8609a96e8930d986a0dc1973b098952d6024d6ad349754d1343b85b882942dfb7e0d0f88580a3f3ed4c3a201a7de47d1ac296f89"
}