mattcrv on Nostr: Many criticize davidmarcus' decision to promote UMA instead of "an off-the-shelf ...
Many criticize
davidmarcus (npub18m4…cl2x)' decision to promote UMA instead of "an off-the-shelf
LNURL implementation with an LUD-18-based compliance and LUD-21".
I think it’s perfectly logical.
Lightspark is targeting VASPs that want to provide a cheap, compliant and instant FX solution to their users.
Those institutions don't care if what's under the hood is LNURL or something else.
If they cared, they'd have implemented LNURL already — the building blocks have been around for years.
Published at
2024-02-18 15:15:30Event JSON
{
"id": "a84fbc26ea27df7d6d76da8406e399d7a869038f945c644b59e72c0d350e44a2",
"pubkey": "865b6bd38e22481c4589bc4b060a0c0cc1304fbdca9a0e3388d4282da8bb83a2",
"created_at": 1708269330,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"3eeb3de14ec5c48c6c4c9ff80908c4186170eabb74b2a6705a7db9f9922cd61e"
]
],
"content": "Many criticize nostr:npub18m4nmc2wchzgcmzvnluqjzxyrpshp64mwje2vuz60kulny3v6c0qtgcl2x' decision to promote UMA instead of \"an off-the-shelf\nLNURL implementation with an LUD-18-based compliance and LUD-21\".\n\nI think it’s perfectly logical.\n\nLightspark is targeting VASPs that want to provide a cheap, compliant and instant FX solution to their users.\n\nThose institutions don't care if what's under the hood is LNURL or something else.\n\nIf they cared, they'd have implemented LNURL already — the building blocks have been around for years.",
"sig": "4f624b07ea1c35a78329aaa25244fbc59a5a323b5742886c6abf8b1cb87bdbb66d0672ddadf1b1047e6f5a53382c9b58d932b96c3a9bbe340175f3c1a2a7c028"
}