š
Original date posted:2013-10-21
š Original message:On 21/10/13 09:07, Jean-Paul Kogelman wrote:
> The list comes from BIP 1.
Sorry, I haven't meant you personally. It was just a generic question
about using existing process instead of inventing a new one on the go.
>> Have it been considered to do this via IETF? The process there is hardened by 40 years of experience and 7000+ RFCs. Probably better than anything you can devise yourself.
>>
>> Martin
>
Martin Sustrik [ARCHIVE] /
npub15pā¦756lp
2023-06-07 15:07:40
in reply to nevent1qā¦3cpq
Author Public Key
npub15pec9usy0vcfawurq0ffrwlrv4trpqv84l02af5h53jw05af83fsn756lpPublished at
2023-06-07 15:07:40Event JSON
{
"id": "a836eaf11f87812ff6ce72961a8ba12ec6f2e56253983bf51bd39b260e9eb306",
"pubkey": "a07382f2047b309ebb8303d291bbe36556308187afdeaea697a464e7d3a93c53",
"created_at": 1686150460,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"d7c1869dab2bd34b6e5ae79cda5d73bda811a1af3e65276521fa77a929d2819d",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"1d23dd1c041987695930cc8caab149b006186a476506fa3838d2c136627858bc",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"874fa44d110b2119208ba6fb27607799f16a00c82143201ad7f179a89f0df349"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2013-10-21\nš Original message:On 21/10/13 09:07, Jean-Paul Kogelman wrote:\n\u003e The list comes from BIP 1.\n\nSorry, I haven't meant you personally. It was just a generic question \nabout using existing process instead of inventing a new one on the go.\n\n\u003e\u003e Have it been considered to do this via IETF? The process there is hardened by 40 years of experience and 7000+ RFCs. Probably better than anything you can devise yourself.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e Martin\n\u003e",
"sig": "0182f9f73aec3a529214b96bd7147457518233373edbcb7a28fbd5f67fe8f198038a050b5b794d5f7b896aff30388e405b39196686cac5ad3692cef0b1f8e34d"
}