Event JSON
{
"id": "a191bfd337faec55298ff4ed4384316ac3c180cfb04c6cdebfdd8be49c682886",
"pubkey": "f8bb95387db659f0ecbfabdf9e83f03c7ad471a31dfbf6283bf09186d776b4db",
"created_at": 1698854148,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"e7f76f0d1fdf887c12cbf5eaf15dd3bb0b88f806051739f63200aae91a8a734e",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"9eefd04d32ab5da8de12d7b83201578ea095a676acf3a692ec1b0b202ae4e16f",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"f68b30204490a96690ef72d64631d0d8b5fc2973e54596e58ed5f0bf8b2afdeb",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.lawprofs.org/users/lpramsey/statuses/111336105499852337",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "Recommend nostr:npub1ulmk7rglm7y8cykt7h40zhwnhv9c37qxq5tnna3jqz4wjx52wd8q2whweg’s live posts of the oral argument in Vidal v Elster. I will post my own comments about it soon but my prediction is that SCOTUS will hold Section 2(c) is constitutional for the reasons I discussed in yesterday’s post: https://x.com/lpramsey/status/1719398509311610900?s=46\u0026t=1H4R5nvqe1DW13O4Um5PyQ",
"sig": "d55bfd4b40c0dba394423a8b995d4fee903234789b4e56c5b14b3e677bc0a249d936866a14c0d52f3db57d50a7d36794a29654ba8fb02c2266f0e36548ad3ce0"
}
