EZ on Nostr: no one was questioning whether Saylor supports the right to self-custody, or whether ...
no one was questioning whether Saylor supports the right to self-custody, or whether Bitcoin benefits from all kinds of investors and entities.
the fuss was about the risks of holding your bitcoin with large custodians and 'inflammatory' comments made towards certain groups of Bitcoiners and hardware wallet developers.
Throwing unwarranted shade on people making Bitcoin secure is not "spreading Bitcoin with love."
Other than that, I couldn't care less what he says or does, but if it comes at the expense of others, it should be and will be called out.
Do better.
He clarified his recent comments. It’s ok for people to do that. 
Published at
2024-10-23 18:28:50Event JSON
{
"id": "a03a24a25bc6f7e616ceca5e958a061bcddb3607c7a9071c3d00589ee80962be",
"pubkey": "83fd07de9b763334cc9d46f2785c2558e6c2eabfe7d0c6ec214667cbaec50d47",
"created_at": 1729708130,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"42a5bce1406dee796b3bac525ad4b400ca03fe17712efcf39adc997a106d98bc",
"wss://relay.primal.net",
"mention"
]
],
"content": "no one was questioning whether Saylor supports the right to self-custody, or whether Bitcoin benefits from all kinds of investors and entities.\n\nthe fuss was about the risks of holding your bitcoin with large custodians and 'inflammatory' comments made towards certain groups of Bitcoiners and hardware wallet developers.\n\nThrowing unwarranted shade on people making Bitcoin secure is not \"spreading Bitcoin with love.\"\n\nOther than that, I couldn't care less what he says or does, but if it comes at the expense of others, it should be and will be called out.\n\nDo better.\n\nnostr:note1g2jmec2qdhh8j6em43f94495qr9q8lshwyh0euu6mjvh5yrdnz7qs6lxuc ",
"sig": "6b08017384cb519a288a1d99404cab68bb0dc6f59d339ab50dd7b51f64dc731ea45ea6ecb92213656ed6072114475647a6de35647b78410f3545bb2fb5171316"
}
