npub1sr944dg6uxldxed4hqdmw4w6jqchgjxahsamgzdv2cuq7d9l8f8qde9e0c (npub1sr9…9e0c) A proszę bardzo:
Ruanni Tupas* and Veronico N. Tarrayo
The violence of literature review and the imperative to ask new questions
https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2024-0014
Received January 8, 2024; accepted January 18, 2024; published online February 23, 2024
Abstract: Writing the literature review is not a neutrał act. In fact, the key central aim of consolidating work in a particular research area is to demonstrate one's knowledge of this area; that is, one must know the 'conversations' concerning the research topic. Literature review becomes violent in the Bourdieusian sense because ił imposes particular configurations of privileged knowledge on researchers. Thus, in this paper, we argue that literature review is an enactment of symbolic violence and, in the process, epistemic theft, and central to this practice is the construction of research questions. Literature review, as a site of scholarly conversations, dictates the kinds of questions we ask, thus unwittingly framing our research according to the epistemic demands of past and recent studies. By asking a different set of questions, 'new' or different understandings about certain social phenomena may emerge.
Keywords: literature review; symbolic violence; epistemic theft; world Englishes;
Philippine English; politics of citation
y-b /
npub1dp…kv253
2024-02-29 16:56:25
in reply to nevent1q…y5ku
Author Public Key
npub1dpy3aay2egwre78u95axvz2dkl0hkeh5585j95l5lln3gd59c4js0kv253Published at
2024-02-29 16:56:25Event JSON
{
"id": "a001803c3dadd7a25f356e38c6a2169ae52155b01162bc91aa5c8b846d2257f5",
"pubkey": "68491ef48aca1c3cf8fc2d3a66094db7df7b66f4a1e922d3f4ffe7143685c565",
"created_at": 1709225785,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"80cb5ab51ae1bed365b5b81bb755da90317448ddbc3bb409ac56380f34bf3a4e",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"290c6560deedb04a62bb0a08ec5b9beeadc3ea73c2f049a0ed6e2c063b745d5f",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"5e9d2b4e1943683d177f9d393ece92537c8c9020eacefc5a14b35c4e58538c0a",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://101010.pl/users/yb/statuses/112015821080115280",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1sr944dg6uxldxed4hqdmw4w6jqchgjxahsamgzdv2cuq7d9l8f8qde9e0c A proszę bardzo:\n\nRuanni Tupas* and Veronico N. Tarrayo\nThe violence of literature review and the imperative to ask new questions\nhttps://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2024-0014\nReceived January 8, 2024; accepted January 18, 2024; published online February 23, 2024\nAbstract: Writing the literature review is not a neutrał act. In fact, the key central aim of consolidating work in a particular research area is to demonstrate one's knowledge of this area; that is, one must know the 'conversations' concerning the research topic. Literature review becomes violent in the Bourdieusian sense because ił imposes particular configurations of privileged knowledge on researchers. Thus, in this paper, we argue that literature review is an enactment of symbolic violence and, in the process, epistemic theft, and central to this practice is the construction of research questions. Literature review, as a site of scholarly conversations, dictates the kinds of questions we ask, thus unwittingly framing our research according to the epistemic demands of past and recent studies. By asking a different set of questions, 'new' or different understandings about certain social phenomena may emerge.\nKeywords: literature review; symbolic violence; epistemic theft; world Englishes;\nPhilippine English; politics of citation",
"sig": "b9700b1be187f2ef9a3c13866f25fded85eb7ee9213ab846831b94e8929a806e4ff079c7c53c673442024159671623a9164bf24ccca63d7f3f4621cf1f79735e"
}