📅 Original date posted:2014-11-16
📝 Original message:I agree with Luke, we can endlessly discuss the "best defaults" like
the default size allowed for OP_RETURN, minimum fees, anti-dust
policies, first-seen vs replace-by-fee, etc; but the fact is that
policies depend on miners. Unfortunately most miners and pools are
quite apathetic when it comes to configure their own policy.
In my opinion the best we can do is to make it easier for miners to
implement their own policies by abstracting out those parts of the
code. Pull requests like #5071 and #5114 are steps in that direction.
So if you're interested in having more miners accepting 80 bytes
OP_RETURN transactions, I suggest you invest some time reviewing and
testing those PRs.
Although this wasn't its main purpose, separating script/standard was
also a little step in the same direction.
Jorge Timón [ARCHIVE] /
npub1fx…cl2d8
2023-06-07 15:27:28
in reply to nevent1q…atlw
Author Public Key
npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8Published at
2023-06-07 15:27:28Event JSON
{
"id": "a0860347dfd2e335ca744b5dec59c78aacd9c730a4f789d3a79ba722a343e47b",
"pubkey": "498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84",
"created_at": 1686151648,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"9ea4322dc19e55ba7a16fb4778826be5d9520c59d79239c258ee43cc77449b49",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"492a1f584fb66dabb57b452e14c17ca625db568f132d8116c54dbdb54ff7bab8",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"5a6d1f44482b67b5b0d30cc1e829b66a251f0dc99448377dbe3c5e0faf6c3803"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-11-16\n📝 Original message:I agree with Luke, we can endlessly discuss the \"best defaults\" like\nthe default size allowed for OP_RETURN, minimum fees, anti-dust\npolicies, first-seen vs replace-by-fee, etc; but the fact is that\npolicies depend on miners. Unfortunately most miners and pools are\nquite apathetic when it comes to configure their own policy.\nIn my opinion the best we can do is to make it easier for miners to\nimplement their own policies by abstracting out those parts of the\ncode. Pull requests like #5071 and #5114 are steps in that direction.\nSo if you're interested in having more miners accepting 80 bytes\nOP_RETURN transactions, I suggest you invest some time reviewing and\ntesting those PRs.\nAlthough this wasn't its main purpose, separating script/standard was\nalso a little step in the same direction.",
"sig": "944dc2d9d9a85f3a4f4fa808b93bc535c8b070604613bb33eaea4afe0c35d22cf2cc2ebe0d4c8f352430da622fe057e89ae1384b84fbf95e2fc189aa0ae5ab50"
}