📅 Original date posted:2016-08-25
📝 Original message:As Luke pointed, BIP44 is already used by many wallets and to my knowledge
people don't have any real world issues with that, including loading funds
in another BIP44 wallet. I'm not saying that BIP44 is perfect from all
points of view, but IMO it just works for most use cases. Let's set it as
final, and propose competing standards which cover all your concerns.
slush
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> > The development paradigm of "maybe detect funds" is not something we
> > should *not* encourage for Bitcoin IMO.
>
> Sorry. That was one "not" to many.
>
> </jonas>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160825/ffbc4f83/attachment.html>;
Marek Palatinus [ARCHIVE] /
npub1xt…acz68
2023-06-07 17:53:05
in reply to nevent1q…unf0
Author Public Key
npub1xtqansnal58rjnnxvyke6kzuvxsz0twg4456awy6ff0525yqgjxqjacz68Seen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 17:53:05Event JSON
{
"id": "afd858f5b1e2078f1b970667f4f343dfd2eb1e093a365a2261eba9808360b7fe",
"pubkey": "32c1d9c27dfd0e394e66612d9d585c61a027adc8ad69aeb89a4a5f455080448c",
"created_at": 1686160385,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"0de582d020d9e7b879d25a73f3538dcc989a93bd96c004bb722b8ccea1b79ae2",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"e55e76303e538373257fca42625b3dd1d9ab814e1ffc1a53bd8de54fb2362c42",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"9a463e0fab8963b013698c15a0f2449d19c97f3b88458e5874095b5006df9a0c"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-08-25\n📝 Original message:As Luke pointed, BIP44 is already used by many wallets and to my knowledge\npeople don't have any real world issues with that, including loading funds\nin another BIP44 wallet. I'm not saying that BIP44 is perfect from all\npoints of view, but IMO it just works for most use cases. Let's set it as\nfinal, and propose competing standards which cover all your concerns.\n\nslush\n\nOn Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e\n\u003e \u003e The development paradigm of \"maybe detect funds\" is not something we\n\u003e \u003e should *not* encourage for Bitcoin IMO.\n\u003e\n\u003e Sorry. That was one \"not\" to many.\n\u003e\n\u003e \u003c/jonas\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160825/ffbc4f83/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "9273afb51437da0450c5c6cbd04584ab96ada2a7e326bb8effe4653cee16c4b3bba43bfa1fa502dcdaf76615e21a84864971e0872e2128218861643dbbabd354"
}