The model I present in that presentation I now call the tapestry model and I conjecture 1) we need to employ it if we’re ever going to build a decentralized web (ie a functioning WoT) and 2) the brain already implements the model.
And the brain of any social organism has got to have an internal representation of the external WoT — one could consider that to be part of the definition of “social.” If a cortical column (or some other patch of neurons) represents an individual in one’s WoT, and contextual trust ratings are calculated for that individual, then would that qualify as neurons having reputation? Perhaps so!
straycat / david
npub1u5…rldq3
2023-12-04 17:51:19
in reply to nevent1q…58ux
Author Public Key
npub1u5njm6g5h5cpw4wy8xugu62e5s7f6fnysv0sj0z3a8rengt2zqhsxrldq3Published at
2023-12-04 17:51:19Event JSON
{
"id": "ab690ea8deb6f42d7acf71b2078d08cb6b3a555c9e3bc0202d14486f8ed5977d",
"pubkey": "e5272de914bd301755c439b88e6959a43c9d2664831f093c51e9c799a16a102f",
"created_at": 1701712279,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"c26069a488055dce61daeb3d9f3f00f27bcf514196be894324fa1cb83d6eedbb"
],
[
"e",
"0d061e83af1031e5b25fc8d2e09e15bb7472a1b1d43d88c1b440d0410a1ba701"
],
[
"p",
"f377b708adc4343cdd2e60ea46c683f25079f757e51204cee381de0f65726648"
]
],
"content": "The model I present in that presentation I now call the tapestry model and I conjecture 1) we need to employ it if we’re ever going to build a decentralized web (ie a functioning WoT) and 2) the brain already implements the model. \n\nAnd the brain of any social organism has got to have an internal representation of the external WoT — one could consider that to be part of the definition of “social.” If a cortical column (or some other patch of neurons) represents an individual in one’s WoT, and contextual trust ratings are calculated for that individual, then would that qualify as neurons having reputation? Perhaps so!",
"sig": "edb65cba16cc98f594b1e63c786373b7d57e5b12f3f8f5b926b9d176ebb533fdd7e37130dd0a7e4f23a934d3fa13b701ef29d95d30d0c4278412995e7eba6b4a"
}