Event JSON
{
"id": "a931f4f89d1a7f902683081f47b84d65d82c3baf9b13f60b4b84bdf6c07dcaaf",
"pubkey": "d3f099e0fcc0c1784667a3973bb259a3350dc2b25c9f2ca0bf580c804779e256",
"created_at": 1691740950,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"ef8e35e9c25ec2add7cf3eee449b3e7762f68113d9f037b3b70951b7d98122d8",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"t",
"ai"
],
[
"t",
"historyofai"
],
[
"t",
"computing"
],
[
"t",
"critique"
],
[
"t",
"technology"
],
[
"t",
"ideology"
],
[
"t",
"manvsmachine"
],
[
"t",
"mit"
],
[
"t",
"weizenbaum"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://neuromatch.social/users/skarthik/statuses/110869934941577810",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "This is a great addendum in the Science magazine for replacing the Turing test for AI models with a \"Weizenbaum test\":\n\n\"Rather than a test of intelligence [like Turing test], a Weizenbaum test would assess the public value of AI technologies, evaluating them according to their real-world implications rather than their proponents’ claims.\"\n\nhttps://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.adk0176\n\nWeizenbaum's questions to make such an assessment in the Bulletin of Atomic scientists seems to be apt not just for AI, but all of technology. \n\n#AI #HistoryOfAI #Computing #Critique #Technology #Ideology #ManVsMachine #MIT #Weizenbaum",
"sig": "9aad976402875bdb26881f7c7c7a89080155ae357308a11c59d43ec6a6534915c6652252114f88f54c30fa7d6f63de86caecd58ce174f650444fdd056d5f9b15"
}