thenaturalinvestor on Nostr: Money represents a relationship. An obligation. We have an obligation to perform a ...
Money represents a relationship.
An obligation. We have an obligation to perform a set of tasks or to provide a good for the exchange of money.
#money as we know it in todays form is debt being pushed around.
If you want to understand something you need to go to the source. If money is debt, where does debt come from?
The biggest issuer of debt is the US government, by a large degree. They decide where the debt goes to and in turn where money is directed.
Does it make sense to let the US government decide the relationships between parties across the world?
Put this in contrast with money which is a bearer asset like bitcoin. It is not debt. The money you own is yours with no counterparty risk. There is no trust required. The source of bitcoin? Concentrated energy, miners.
So the source of these relationships that form because of the exchange of money stems from the ability to harness and channel energy effectively.
What makes more sense to you? Do you want to rely on a money that’s source is dependent on how well you channel energy, or on money issued by a few individuals who are stuck in a decaying system with no other option but to exponentially increase the amount of money in that system.
Your choice.
Published at
2023-03-22 12:45:23Event JSON
{
"id": "a497736aff1b28404c831b4dffa666fe00eee64f2bff2e45532f9ff4cc7dc0a4",
"pubkey": "ba24c7073dc801b790a4a27201e7568ea8e704f944adf356f557d0d0c52e3b35",
"created_at": 1679489123,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"money"
]
],
"content": "Money represents a relationship. \n\nAn obligation. We have an obligation to perform a set of tasks or to provide a good for the exchange of money. \n\n #money as we know it in todays form is debt being pushed around. \n\nIf you want to understand something you need to go to the source. If money is debt, where does debt come from?\n\nThe biggest issuer of debt is the US government, by a large degree. They decide where the debt goes to and in turn where money is directed.\n\nDoes it make sense to let the US government decide the relationships between parties across the world? \n\nPut this in contrast with money which is a bearer asset like bitcoin. It is not debt. The money you own is yours with no counterparty risk. There is no trust required. The source of bitcoin? Concentrated energy, miners. \n\nSo the source of these relationships that form because of the exchange of money stems from the ability to harness and channel energy effectively.\n\nWhat makes more sense to you? Do you want to rely on a money that’s source is dependent on how well you channel energy, or on money issued by a few individuals who are stuck in a decaying system with no other option but to exponentially increase the amount of money in that system.\n\nYour choice.",
"sig": "1c480e3d4fd146e41125711bb238c7d301bb1b63c179084cf74778d038300d45c2eb9188be6a656a7c71d26b8dec679ab05b0b67e5531203c27c3d89216fb102"
}