📅 Original date posted:2023-06-03
🗒️ Summary of this message: Bitcoin developers discuss the removal of the need for a commitment transaction, enabling data inclusion within a single transaction.
📝 Original message:
On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 9:49 AM Joost Jager <joost.jager at gmail.com> wrote:
> The removal of the need for a commitment transaction also enables the
> inclusion of data within a single transaction that relies on its own
> transaction identifier (txid). This is possible because the txid
> calculation does not incorporate the annex, where the data would be housed.
> This feature can be beneficial in scenarios that require the emulation of
> covenants through the use of presigned transactions involving an ephemeral
> signer.
>
I think this avoidance of a circular reference is also why LN-Symmetry uses
the annex?
Joost
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20230603/defc2cc7/attachment.html>;
Joost Jager [ARCHIVE] /
npub1as…wfqmx
2023-06-19 18:19:52
in reply to nevent1q…lptt
Author Public Key
npub1aslmpzentw224n3s6yccru4dq2qdlx7rfudfnqevfck637cjt6esswfqmxPublished at
2023-06-19 18:19:52Event JSON
{
"id": "acb418b5be613f5452734364b45fcfde29e07504b82ef0eaa992d05043708d5d",
"pubkey": "ec3fb08b335b94aace30d13181f2ad0280df9bc34f1a99832c4e2da8fb125eb3",
"created_at": 1687198792,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"68ea5a0105a7a492dce97362b0bd66bf00dac11bf2874dff55cd731b6f35e825",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"82ac5ab56bef52a50580d73b9b2ac9c4dc5e2b5e53bcf23327c066a725185d1f",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"ec3fb08b335b94aace30d13181f2ad0280df9bc34f1a99832c4e2da8fb125eb3"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2023-06-03\n🗒️ Summary of this message: Bitcoin developers discuss the removal of the need for a commitment transaction, enabling data inclusion within a single transaction.\n📝 Original message:\nOn Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 9:49 AM Joost Jager \u003cjoost.jager at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e The removal of the need for a commitment transaction also enables the\n\u003e inclusion of data within a single transaction that relies on its own\n\u003e transaction identifier (txid). This is possible because the txid\n\u003e calculation does not incorporate the annex, where the data would be housed.\n\u003e This feature can be beneficial in scenarios that require the emulation of\n\u003e covenants through the use of presigned transactions involving an ephemeral\n\u003e signer.\n\u003e\n\nI think this avoidance of a circular reference is also why LN-Symmetry uses\nthe annex?\n\nJoost\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20230603/defc2cc7/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "eafcab4cf20feb7189364abd328cac0c467435409600643f0705a61cd10974ad0db3d57ccaf669c65847f396d7b0ead981a2fd7eba5fb41af4a4df62331d5cd1"
}