Bryan Bishop [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2022-06-27 📝 Original message:Hi, On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 ...
📅 Original date posted:2022-06-27
📝 Original message:Hi,
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 2:14 PM Alfred Hodler via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 2. Notification transactions still exist but no longer leave a privacy
> footprint on the blockchain. Instead, a notification transaction is simply
> a single OP_RETURN containing a value that only Alice and Bob can
> calculate. If Alice's notification transaction uses UTXOs not associated
> with her identity, there is never a footprint showing that either her or
> Bob are using private payments. If Alice uses tainted coins, only she is
> exposed as a user of Private Payments but Bob still isn't.
>
That's a neat trick. What about not using OP_RETURN at all, and just
publishing on a tor hidden service that other wallets check? Alice
wouldn't have to expose on-chain that she is a sender of a private payment.
- Bryan
https://twitter.com/kanzure-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220627/9e90ead7/attachment-0001.html>
Published at
2023-06-07 23:10:46Event JSON
{
"id": "ac6a1b4775afa0ea9c56c641f53382b62435b222c904ae3bb9375e3d706e4c7c",
"pubkey": "62ddcb547224b421822b62845fb1bbd77c838b924bd022814cfcbe25b7a07475",
"created_at": 1686179446,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"2c117deceb80922b32181925f44f4eb7705b67956a1c3a9bf3e3a63b07a98031",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"dd81fb9f446ee9a09a61a5df2d9a7b5aef2a7ee5383a55da489fff240834c90c",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"320caaa48ab3daa9401088967d96c6f3d51a64d5241df2b47206a5c2475075d1"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2022-06-27\n📝 Original message:Hi,\n\nOn Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 2:14 PM Alfred Hodler via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e 2. Notification transactions still exist but no longer leave a privacy\n\u003e footprint on the blockchain. Instead, a notification transaction is simply\n\u003e a single OP_RETURN containing a value that only Alice and Bob can\n\u003e calculate. If Alice's notification transaction uses UTXOs not associated\n\u003e with her identity, there is never a footprint showing that either her or\n\u003e Bob are using private payments. If Alice uses tainted coins, only she is\n\u003e exposed as a user of Private Payments but Bob still isn't.\n\u003e\n\nThat's a neat trick. What about not using OP_RETURN at all, and just\npublishing on a tor hidden service that other wallets check? Alice\nwouldn't have to expose on-chain that she is a sender of a private payment.\n\n- Bryan\nhttps://twitter.com/kanzure\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220627/9e90ead7/attachment-0001.html\u003e",
"sig": "73886dc023d0476557c7da938732b007bbc53c55acfe9273b432a93c5e2180cc783b80acb3176bd72a98b9aa5233f31c8b322e8bfe965ce4b786ebc101cbc0f3"
}