📅 Original date posted:2015-03-25
📝 Original message:On Tuesday, 24 March 2015, at 6:57 pm, Tom Harding wrote:
> It appears that a limited-lifetime address, such as the fanciful
>
> address = 4HB5ld0FzFVj8ALj6mfBsbifRoD4miY36v_349366
>
> where 349366 is the last valid block for a transaction paying this
> address, could be made reuse-proof with bounded resource requirements,
The core devs seem not to like ideas such as this because a transaction that was once valid can become invalid due to a chain reorganization.
Matt Whitlock [ARCHIVE] /
npub17q…upwet
2023-06-07 15:32:12
in reply to nevent1q…7mtj
Author Public Key
npub17qxssk9sj2r7jswvh3y32e7vwz7mcckhz33gk9nurdmw0lhsfkgswupwetPublished at
2023-06-07 15:32:12Event JSON
{
"id": "a29cdd08a4365dc6dc680a69097ca7fed9a9ef8adfe1dbd7f09d423087ed91da",
"pubkey": "f00d0858b09287e941ccbc491567cc70bdbc62d714628b167c1b76e7fef04d91",
"created_at": 1686151932,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"13ba2dac7eec5154e8f99682c168a8cede79e5ef5e0b1fe726762657ed73749d",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"b56819a9b91c6a9aef424bd868035dd0aeb28a931aa6957d003c29492de2c4ab",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"dc329a02c970aabf03b87185ef51c86afe4586fe3a148508af898af3fabc56a3"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-03-25\n📝 Original message:On Tuesday, 24 March 2015, at 6:57 pm, Tom Harding wrote:\n\u003e It appears that a limited-lifetime address, such as the fanciful\n\u003e \n\u003e address = 4HB5ld0FzFVj8ALj6mfBsbifRoD4miY36v_349366\n\u003e \n\u003e where 349366 is the last valid block for a transaction paying this \n\u003e address, could be made reuse-proof with bounded resource requirements, \n\nThe core devs seem not to like ideas such as this because a transaction that was once valid can become invalid due to a chain reorganization.",
"sig": "f01f47c819200cfc74c47d56b06551b40c28a6a2d11f608f1824299dd6adfb2334a34cf1a97471ebdce8fc0083e210f2e0c08fd724390d1872a1451f20bddba0"
}