Gregory Maxwell [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: ๐
Original date posted:2014-07-18 ๐ Original message:On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at ...
๐
Original date posted:2014-07-18
๐ Original message:On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Aaron Voisine <voisine at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 9. New signatures by the sender
>
> I'm not suggesting it be required, but it would be possible to
> mitigate this one by requiring that all signatures deterministically
> generate k per RFC6979. I'm using this in breadwallet.
Nope.
Your homework assignment is to explain why. :)
Published at
2023-06-07 15:24:15Event JSON
{
"id": "a2c433180eb1810e8bc1a6cb672ec04fb65baded11db524353f1fdc7c3c5bc68",
"pubkey": "4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73",
"created_at": 1686151455,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"bd724105ae316b349d93a76fd25acc857c6eaea5c338fe45ec1a0cf9e46b9c93",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"7c1071577313100a78fdfddf75c30c84da6fd0f8b96452dfe47df2883078fe5a",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"3a24ce2145c5488aebfb0fc113e7d44234e9d3733afa45e2d880eb259c3eade3"
]
],
"content": "๐
Original date posted:2014-07-18\n๐ Original message:On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Aaron Voisine \u003cvoisine at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e 9. New signatures by the sender\n\u003e\n\u003e I'm not suggesting it be required, but it would be possible to\n\u003e mitigate this one by requiring that all signatures deterministically\n\u003e generate k per RFC6979. I'm using this in breadwallet.\n\nNope.\n\nYour homework assignment is to explain why. :)",
"sig": "4b4c22f8406035cf14278f89e5855d651c292863b17fd669ad8912d83315cf9ca3c88f767c4176ebe682374a66fae25146fec5145c306f165539283658992752"
}