📅 Original date posted:2017-09-05
📝 Original message:This is not a priority, not very important either.
Right now it is possible to create 0-value outputs that are spendable
and thus stay in the utxo (potentially forever). Requiring at least 1
satoshi per output doesn't really do much against a spam attack to the
utxo, but I think it would be slightly better than the current
situation.
Is there any reason or use case to keep allowing spendable outputs
with null amounts in them?
If not, I'm happy to create a BIP with its code, this should be simple.
Jorge Timón [ARCHIVE] /
npub1fx…cl2d8
2023-06-07 18:05:24
in reply to nevent1q…t5vn
Author Public Key
npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8Published at
2023-06-07 18:05:24Event JSON
{
"id": "a39b3c771d44c8252d23ae0716b844a27828b165d3ea5365455384435712c745",
"pubkey": "498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84",
"created_at": 1686161124,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"413baa220fa53193ec24f7b2af5b62e55b6671426a96b98b656e438fd923e071",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a23dbf6c6cc83e14cc3df4e56cc71845f611908084cfe620e83e40c06ccdd3d0"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2017-09-05\n📝 Original message:This is not a priority, not very important either.\nRight now it is possible to create 0-value outputs that are spendable\nand thus stay in the utxo (potentially forever). Requiring at least 1\nsatoshi per output doesn't really do much against a spam attack to the\nutxo, but I think it would be slightly better than the current\nsituation.\n\nIs there any reason or use case to keep allowing spendable outputs\nwith null amounts in them?\n\nIf not, I'm happy to create a BIP with its code, this should be simple.",
"sig": "29b88e047a032fd5747d98bb82b93d0470c7739ada6c23f71c2af87918cb0070531560626347cad214cc1e2caf0d4806da08b89a787ca4f996b2891253eb6155"
}