📅 Original date posted:2014-03-13
📝 Original message:>
> Well it looks like the consensus is to do it, instead of talking about
> it. I'm going to make sure we get uBTC into the next Armory release.
>
Hmm - be careful with the word "consensus" here. A bunch of people on a
mailing list does not make consensus ;)
If you survey other wallets, you'll find most already switched to mBTC,
that it took some effort to do so (look at the size of the patches for
instance) and that probably, nobody is super-keen to change again so soon.
So uBTC would make you different to most of the other wallets and services
in wide usage.
If Armory wants to do that, that's no problem, maybe it will be a
competitive advantage - just saying, don't quote this thread as indicating
some kind of community consensus.
Wallets and services that are using mBTC (that I know of)
blockchain.info
MultiBit
Bitcoin Wallet (Android)
Hive
Bitcoinity
KnC Wallet (defaults to BTC but can be switched to mBTC in settings, uBTC
not an option)
Mullvad
btcstore.eu
Doing a google search for [bitcoin "mBTC"] and [bitcoin "uBTC"], the former
has a bunch of sites and services with prices in mBTC. The latter only has
faucets, as far as I can tell, which sort of makes sense.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140313/17fbe703/attachment.html>;
Mike Hearn [ARCHIVE] /
npub17t…4qgyd
2023-06-07 15:15:37
in reply to nevent1q…3e36
Author Public Key
npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgydPublished at
2023-06-07 15:15:37Event JSON
{
"id": "a3b31c99d4c6651f5ec6b7e76ce8967d9fd196701c5dec649ee8779622f7fd5b",
"pubkey": "f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2",
"created_at": 1686150937,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"a5889b6003c7241c893062a271bfd01eb179b582d390c0baf2198e69cbfe2d2d",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"cb39ccfba503248e6f1ba379dc7992195343dbb8a30240cc652dc019bad35206",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"30217b018a47b99ed4c20399b44b02f70ec4f58ed77a2814a563fa28322ef722"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-03-13\n📝 Original message:\u003e\n\u003e Well it looks like the consensus is to do it, instead of talking about\n\u003e it. I'm going to make sure we get uBTC into the next Armory release.\n\u003e\n\nHmm - be careful with the word \"consensus\" here. A bunch of people on a\nmailing list does not make consensus ;)\n\nIf you survey other wallets, you'll find most already switched to mBTC,\nthat it took some effort to do so (look at the size of the patches for\ninstance) and that probably, nobody is super-keen to change again so soon.\nSo uBTC would make you different to most of the other wallets and services\nin wide usage.\n\nIf Armory wants to do that, that's no problem, maybe it will be a\ncompetitive advantage - just saying, don't quote this thread as indicating\nsome kind of community consensus.\n\nWallets and services that are using mBTC (that I know of)\n\nblockchain.info\nMultiBit\nBitcoin Wallet (Android)\nHive\nBitcoinity\nKnC Wallet (defaults to BTC but can be switched to mBTC in settings, uBTC\nnot an option)\nMullvad\nbtcstore.eu\n\nDoing a google search for [bitcoin \"mBTC\"] and [bitcoin \"uBTC\"], the former\nhas a bunch of sites and services with prices in mBTC. The latter only has\nfaucets, as far as I can tell, which sort of makes sense.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140313/17fbe703/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "46c16dc6cc9ee4df162faa950e5f6c79a13ac5e5dc499aa73bd5c6abbadc65439d56b8ca8d69ac82ba6f84a4dbecf7f2820328fed8d28720b29442f62e591e9b"
}