Event JSON
{
"id": "a38377bf7f45b484465094baa56a354335f3e6d5c4b6949f1091fcea2531aace",
"pubkey": "ba51d3bb7fc92891016b5873c0b4f7c6a0550c964ec565ece24b6fc2dcf93301",
"created_at": 1740406496,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"5685fbbc4fea6efa53810a46b15ed619d55275412bbb1ea917bc8f35a433df8c",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"ba0e1688a7414193a26f371924e606bbfef27833b13b83d4d81b376e3dcc8edf",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"d4cc379dd245c96572c2bf275611298bd247fc65859fdb7a7db5c7006cc0c567",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mathstodon.xyz/users/jonmsterling/statuses/114059280157857906",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq26zlh0z0afh055uppfrtzhkkr824ya2p9wa3a2ghhj8ntfpnm7xqtulpgt Yeah... When working in Lean, I use intrinsically typed de bruijn indices; but for the de bruijn level layer, I don't really know how or if it is possible to gain benefits from benefit types here (because you want weakening to be silent and not require a traversal). A good representation of the latter would be really cool, but I am not sure what it would be :)",
"sig": "990f5157e4d598bfd2878ba507ffe5580712f8032e4c310c4f8e08668dd5c1a6402953fa1a6b4acded8c269b67890cc40590d529c2063f1313c512d7a4f29408"
}