📅 Original date posted:2013-10-21
📝 Original message:How about putting them into sub directories that map onto the status of the BIP?
Reading BIP 1, that would make:
Accepted
Active
Draft
Deferred
Final
Rejected
Replaced
Withdrawn
Would that place NODE_BLOOM and BIP 38 in Deferred?
On 2013-10-20, at 11:43 PM, Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:40:26PM -0700, Jean-Paul Kogelman wrote:
>>
>> I was wondering, would it be possible to create an area where proposals like your NODE_BLOOM and BIP 38 could live?
>
> Sure, I think Jeff mentioned the idea of a specific drafts/ directory
> within the repository. (could also do a rejected/)
>
> Less of an issue in some ways when it's all in git - just point people
> to your bips fork.
>
> --
> 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
> 00000000000000099eaa116fac83a2b0e097cae3391c794990e128c8e162d91a
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131020/9af62985/attachment.sig>;
Jean-Paul Kogelman [ARCHIVE] /
npub1sa…8y304
2023-06-07 15:07:37
in reply to nevent1q…uahl
Author Public Key
npub1sa86gng3pvs3jgyt5majwcrhn8ck5qxgy9pjqxkh79u638cd7dys28y304Published at
2023-06-07 15:07:37Event JSON
{
"id": "af4f899fcd0db5f54fdf6501dc400ff3e7b2a2058783a84e4379fd68309f4a24",
"pubkey": "874fa44d110b2119208ba6fb27607799f16a00c82143201ad7f179a89f0df349",
"created_at": 1686150457,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"d7c1869dab2bd34b6e5ae79cda5d73bda811a1af3e65276521fa77a929d2819d",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"98e27df8798fa2a0fb8c819ffe3dca7607438849c4f1ed4bb3f33230fd87a721",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2013-10-21\n📝 Original message:How about putting them into sub directories that map onto the status of the BIP? \n\nReading BIP 1, that would make: \n\nAccepted\nActive\nDraft\nDeferred\nFinal\nRejected\nReplaced\nWithdrawn\n\nWould that place NODE_BLOOM and BIP 38 in Deferred?\n\n\nOn 2013-10-20, at 11:43 PM, Peter Todd \u003cpete at petertodd.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:40:26PM -0700, Jean-Paul Kogelman wrote:\n\u003e\u003e \n\u003e\u003e I was wondering, would it be possible to create an area where proposals like your NODE_BLOOM and BIP 38 could live? \n\u003e \n\u003e Sure, I think Jeff mentioned the idea of a specific drafts/ directory\n\u003e within the repository. (could also do a rejected/)\n\u003e \n\u003e Less of an issue in some ways when it's all in git - just point people\n\u003e to your bips fork.\n\u003e \n\u003e -- \n\u003e 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n\u003e 00000000000000099eaa116fac83a2b0e097cae3391c794990e128c8e162d91a\n\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 842 bytes\nDesc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131020/9af62985/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "468f1372d12d557d74be0562366ce19eb403be3dc6ec3862abb180df30239ebdd87d964a6f7f9ff4eaf03c3b6e685c1f6162f747871b952f765326b0309b382c"
}