📅 Original date posted:2014-02-12
📝 Original message:On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Rune Kjær Svendsen
<runesvend at gmail.com> wrote:
> Instead of trying to remove the possibility of transaction
> malleability, would it make sense to define a new, "canonical
> transaction hash/ID" (cTxID),
Yes, that is one proposal: https://github.com/sipa/bitcoin/commits/normtxid
But it is not a complete solution for all transaction types.
--
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
Jeff Garzik [ARCHIVE] /
npub1kf…f3f58
2023-06-07 15:13:31
in reply to nevent1q…r2ql
Author Public Key
npub1kf0ppcjaguxekg24yx6smgxlu73qn0k8lm0t2wrqc0scpl7u3sgsmf3f58Published at
2023-06-07 15:13:31Event JSON
{
"id": "ad6b113de970fe2440a37010d50415956556f4b527575fcfc6646764fcef8ea7",
"pubkey": "b25e10e25d470d9b215521b50da0dfe7a209bec7fedeb53860c3e180ffdc8c11",
"created_at": 1686150811,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"76969a008b621e54c247029127aebdfbea1794fb79dd58e07b32a76157512d29",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"72eb42e3b2602875b6051efbdd27b8ea770dbb5c2b448c475d846d200381046a",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"7e57666cff7c86f9410d33d4d34ef3e5105395b3c74af472541dbeeb743f9de3"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-02-12\n📝 Original message:On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Rune Kjær Svendsen\n\u003crunesvend at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e Instead of trying to remove the possibility of transaction\n\u003e malleability, would it make sense to define a new, \"canonical\n\u003e transaction hash/ID\" (cTxID),\n\nYes, that is one proposal: https://github.com/sipa/bitcoin/commits/normtxid\n\nBut it is not a complete solution for all transaction types.\n\n-- \nJeff Garzik\nBitcoin core developer and open source evangelist\nBitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/",
"sig": "6d5dec0a57926659b544630a282eeeb68a2cf1f0200033fd0ec3fe622a43da4755bf6dac6da83c842c04e683509e96b497a4428267ea117fe867ceb685cb789f"
}